saikabhi's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 48145391 | over 8 years ago | Thanks for the prompt responses and fixes. Welcome to OpenStreetMap and please keep contributing more edits. Cheers,
|
| 48145391 | over 8 years ago | Hello, Following on from the comment in your other changeset, building=* tag should not be over an entire area. It should only cover individual building footprints as seen in the satellite imagery. The area can be tagged with landuse=* tags. I am going ahead and making the correrctions to this changeset. Please keep this in mind in your next edits. Happy mapping! Thanks,
|
| 48146580 | over 8 years ago | Correct link to the feature: way/489466790 |
| 48146580 | over 8 years ago | Hello, Thank you for contributing to OpenStreetMap. I have noticed that you have drawn a large building over an entire area: way/489466790and . The building should be ideally drawn only over the building outline you see in the satellite imagery. Can you please go ahead and fix it?
|
| 48148743 | over 8 years ago | Hello, Thank you for contributing to OpenStreetMap. I have noticed that you have drawn a large building over an entire area: way/489485834. The building should be ideally drawn only over the building outline you see in the satellite imagery. Can you please go ahead and fix it? Thanks,
|
| 48018893 | over 8 years ago | Hi, Thank you for contributing to OpenStreetMap. I have observed in this changeset that you have changed the place node for Xangri-lá from town to village. Any particular source or local knowledge for the change? Thanks,
|
| 47528007 | over 8 years ago | The community in OpenStreetMap verifies edits coming to OpenStreetMap to make sure bad edits do not come into the map. Please make sure that you are adding only correct information to the map. Thank you for contributing to mapping. Happy mapping again. Cheers
|
| 47528007 | over 8 years ago | Hi,
|
| 47533170 | over 8 years ago | Reverting changeset: 47514714 |
| 47501624 | over 8 years ago | Hello, Thank you for contributing to OpenStreetMap. In this particular changeset, I have noticed that you have deleted sections of the road plus surrounding building. Any reason for doing that? I am reverting this changeset for now. Thanks,
|
| 47185963 | over 8 years ago | Hi, Again similar issues in this changeset as to this one: changeset/47188620. When we delete buildings instead of modifying it, we lose some important information. Thanks,
|
| 47188620 | over 8 years ago | Hello 3yoda, Thank you for contributing to OpenStreetMap.
Regards,
|
| 46541483 | over 8 years ago | Hello Essin, Thank you pointing this out. Review of satellite imagery and the fact it was buffered on both ends by motorways was the reason behind my changes. Obviously, on the basis of your local knowledge and evidence, it's clear that I made a mistake. I apologise for the error. Can you please revert it back to it's original state? Thanks again,
|
| 46329659 | almost 9 years ago | Source is OSMCha |
| 46116832 | almost 9 years ago | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap and thank you for contributing. I have seen that you have added ways without any valid keys with only altitude tags. I am reverting this changeset for now. Please take care in the future. Thanks,
|
| 46144088 | almost 9 years ago | Hi, Thank you for contributing to OpenStreetMap. I have noticed that this particular changeset has untagged ways. Any particular reason behind the additions? Can you please review and make corrections? Thanks,
|
| 46122013 | almost 9 years ago | Hi cicconep, Welcome to OpenStreetMap and thank you for contributing. I have noticed some random footways and the same park added twice. Please be careful in the future while adding data to OpenStreetMap. Reverting your changeset for now. Thanks,
|
| 45470102 | almost 9 years ago | Slight correction: Not restricted to SF area only |
| 45469607 | almost 9 years ago | Slight correction: Not restricted to SF area only |
| 43337337 | about 9 years ago | Same issues as commented in : changeset/43337505 and changeset/43337820 |