Hello,
Thank you for contributing to OpenStreetMap. I have noticed that you have added a stream way/492668339 that is not visible in satellite imagery. Have you added it from local knowledge? Can you please verify your edits again?

Thank you,
Abhishek

Hello,

Thank you for contributing to OpenStreetMap. I have seen that you have added way/492683798/history and way/492683071/history as waterways to the map. These features are not visible from satellite imagery. Have you traced them from local knowledge? Can you verify your edits once again and see if they are correct?

Thank you
Abhishek

Hello,

Thank you for contributing to OpenStreetMap. I have noticed that the lake way/492693098 you have added might be redundant information as there is already a multipolygon way tagged as `wetland`. Can you please go ahead and remove your `lake` feature? Thank you.

Abhishek

Hello,

Thank you for contributing to OpenStreetMap. I see that you have added waterway=river for way/492693131. Are you sure that waterway is a river? A more appropriate tag might be`waterway=stream`. Can you please verify again?

Thank you,
Abhishek

Hi,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. I have noticed that you are adding fictional waterways to the map. Going ahead and reverting those changes. Please be careful while adding data to OpenStreetMap.

Thanks,
Abhishek

Hi,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Are you sure this lake: way/490985355 exists on the ground? I cannot verify it through satellite imagery.

Thanks,
Abhishek

Hi,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. I am noticing some fictional parks and waterways added by you to the map. I am reverting your changeset for now. Please don't add fictional data to the map in future. Thank you for contributing to OpenStreetMap.

Cheers,
Abhishek

Hi,
Again, continuing on from the changeset comment: changeset/48323895, this changeset also contains fictional waterways. Reverting this changeset too for now.
Thanks,
Abhishek

Hi,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Looks like you are adding fictional waterways to valid cycleways and fictional lakes. Please do not add fictional data to the map. Only features on the ground should be mapped. Any particular reason for doing this? Going to revert your changeset now. Please be careful in the future.

Thanks,
Abhishek

Hi,

Again in this changeset, you are tagging parks with multiple leisure=* tags. That might not be required. Can you just review your edits and remove any unnecessary tags for parks that you have created?

Thank you again for contributing to OpenStreetMap.

Cheers,
Abhishek

Hi,

Thank you for contributing to OpenStreetMap. This way: way/468752230 was tagged with multiple leisure=* tags. Removing all the other tags and keeping only leisure=park. That one tag should be enough.

Thank you
Abhishek

Hi,

Thank you for contributing to OpenStreetMap. In this changeset, for way/151479829 you have changed landuse=residential to landuse=meadow which appears to be incorrect. Can you please change the tag back to the previous state?

Thanks,
Abhishek

Hi,

Thank you for contributing for OpenStreetMap. You have changed the tags of this feature from lanuse=village_green to landuse=meadow for this way:way/458109988/. Any particular reason for doing that? The earlier tag appears to be correct. Can you change it back to the earlier tag?

Thanks,
Abhishek

Hi Bhavana,

Thank you for contributing to OpenStreetMap. I have noticed that you have tagged the entire building along with the nodes with building=yes tag. You dont need to tag building nodes with building tag. Only the way needs to be tagged with building=yes. For now to fix your errors, run JOSM validator> click on `building inside building` error> go to `Selection`> Select way nodes > Delete. Apart from this also fix crossing buildings and building duplicated nodes errors when you run the validator.

Thanks,
Abhishek

Hi,

Thank you for contributing to OpenStreetMap. I have noticed that you have tagged the entire area as a building. Individual buildings should be traced separately and then tagged with building=* tags rather then the entire area. Can you please go ahead and make the changes accordingly for:way/301061708?

Thanks,
Abhishek

Hi,
Thank you for contributing to OpenStreetMap. In case of way/490500075, you should trace individual buildings within the school campus from satellite imagery and tag them with building=* rather than tagging the entire school area as one building. Can you go ahead and make the changes?

Thanks,
Abhishek

Hi,
Thank you for contributing to OpenStreetMap.
I am seeing that you are adding large buildings for areas. building=* tag should only be added to the building outline as seen from the satellite imagery. The area can be tagged with landuse=* tags. Can you go ahead and trace the individual building outlines within the area: way/490609602?
Thanks,
Abhishek

Hi,

Thank you for contributing to OpenStreetMap.
I am seeing that you are adding large buildings for areas. building=* tag should only be added to the building outline as seen from the satellite imagery. The area can be tagged with landuse=* tags. Examples: way/490617409 and way/490617070. Can you go ahead and fix the building outlines?

Thanks,
Abhishek

If you have local knowledge of any parks and any other features in your area, please go ahead and map them. Please keep contributing.

Hi,
Thank you for contributing to OpenStreetMap. I have noticed that you have tagged an entire area with building=yes. Individual building footprints as seen from the satellite imagery should be traced separately within the area. The areas can be tagged with landuse tags. This is the link to the feature:way/489429722. Can you please go ahead and fix it?

Happy mapping!
Thanks,
Abhishek