ramyaragupathy's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 52780605 | about 8 years ago | source is Bing, not TIGER |
| 47608176 | over 8 years ago | naolive, Agree that I should have asked before deleting. Reverting the deletion. That done, I staunchly believe that local knowledge trumps everything else. Thank you! |
| 47641262 | over 8 years ago | Hi DuarteRaf, are you sure this is a park way/485965798 ? Looks like parking amenity in the imagery |
| 47608176 | over 8 years ago | May be, it'd be great to have this verified agains an imagery source or by a local mapper |
| 47608176 | over 8 years ago | *If this has been added based on your local knowledge, please go ahead adding it. Typo in the previous comment |
| 47608176 | over 8 years ago | Hi Waulom Amarante, welcome to OpenStreetMap! I've removed the park that you added here, since it was not matching the Bing imagery source. If this has not added based on your local knowledge, please go ahead adding it and mention it as a source in your changeset as well. Happy mapping! Ramya |
| 47371998 | over 8 years ago | Hi ChienTang Li, great to see you contributing to OpenStreetMap! The hotel that you've added here seems to be on the highway. If the hotel building is around, can you please move this node to the exact building location? Thank you |
| 45796255 | over 8 years ago | Hi @ACT3, welcome to OpenStreetMap! I've reverted your edits in Riyadh, since they're irrelevant & not in line with the imagery. Please make sure to add information based on satellite imagery/local knowledge.
|
| 45895174 | almost 9 years ago | Hello Mark Wong, Welcome to OpenStreetMap! Happy to see you editing here, but this changeset in particular seems to be adding a duplicate data to ʻIolani Palace. So I've removed the duplicate from your edits. Thanks
|
| 42706655 | about 9 years ago | Hi @chihchun, just fixed this through changeset/44472506. Thanks for noticing. There seems to be lot of room for improving building footprint in this vicinity. However imagery is not helping here. Need local mappers to fix the outlines. |
| 43205415 | about 9 years ago | Hello! Seeing that certain buildings in this have been deleted and re-added using the custom imagery. It would be great if you could add the other deleted buildings as well as they are clearly visible in the custom imagery that you have used. |
| 42163805 | over 9 years ago | wrong changeset comment. That should be updating tag details |
| 40472998 | over 9 years ago | Hi @Toyota Nexus7, your point on Brussels holds good. However in India, the general agreement is to use English names for name key and have a separate tag for Indic languages. Related reading osm.wiki/WikiProject_India#Naming_in_different_scripts_and_languages |
| 40343096 | over 9 years ago | Here is more information on OpenStreetMap naming practices osm.wiki/Names |
| 40343096 | over 9 years ago | Hi @Toyota Nexus7, great to see you contributing to OpenStreetMap! It'd be awesome if you add tamil names as a separate tag name:ta instead of appending it to English names. For now I have removed bilingual values of city names that you have been editing. Going ahead please stick to adding tamil name as a separate tag. Thanks! |
| 40193960 | over 9 years ago | Hi @Ty-R-Mill,
If the data you add is not consistent with the tags that are commonly used, then it adds no value to the end users of the map. Also your comment should be indicative of what you are contributing to the map. More on mapping good practices here -> osm.wiki/Good_practice#Good_changeset_comments I'd recommend you going through the following tutorial as it is greatly helpful in addressing common questions on OSM mapping practices http://learnosm.org/en/beginner/introduction/ |
| 37863665 | over 9 years ago | It's fine to mark doctor's houses as just buildings |
| 38941880 | over 9 years ago | Uploaded from an import account accidentally |
| 37863665 | over 9 years ago | There are a bunch of buildings in this changeset which has amenity=doctors tag and building=yes. Are your sure there are so many clinics in this area?
|
| 37851699 | over 9 years ago | Also can you make sure to combine the small segments this road? |