rab's Comments

Changeset	When	Comment
99988071	almost 5 years ago	Hi, here are a lot of recent changeset comments you should read and react to. http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussions?c=Zambia&d=30#7/-14.525/27.966
98722650	almost 5 years ago	hi KFields0331, this is a astonishing creative first changeset. I do especially like this tunnel/bridge construction.
99638087	almost 5 years ago	Unfortunately, this is true. The pace on these projects has already slowed significantly. Once forgotten, the data remains untouched for years. And whenever a new beginner project is needed, the same procedure is repeated in another district.
99638087	almost 5 years ago	hi ftcat, @SColchester, do you need a helping hand? First thing I do handling with such bad data, is to search for insane short ways and delete them right away. This will give a good starting point for further manual corrections. Alternatively it might be a good idea to ask the dwg if they can help. osm.wiki/Data_working_group
99576675	almost 5 years ago	Hello, You have squared the district boundary. way/770253481
99371646	almost 5 years ago	Hello, something went wrong here: node/3444299589
99223834	almost 5 years ago	way/906888424 way/906888423 changeset/99226479
99223834	almost 5 years ago	Hi, when changing highway=construction you should always remove the construction=* tag. I would also recommend to re tag this roads only if you are 100% sure that construction work is finished. According to maxar imagery there are more roads to add (still in construction phase) . also there are some path ways that need to be removed. Please note to that once the construction tagging is removed, those areas that still need work are hard to identify.
98806198	almost 5 years ago	ID über osm.org/ -Bearbeiten starten?
87781832	almost 5 years ago	leftovers? @TendaiNkomo/history
96892215	almost 5 years ago	Here's what I mean: osm.org/directions?engine=fossgis_osrm_car&route=-3.32653%2C36.63416%3B-3.33279%2C36.63783
96892215	almost 5 years ago	Hi, it's up to you i would say. Removing the oneway tag and the overlapping segment (way/653847215) would be the simplest fix. Redrawing with two separated lanes imo the more accurate solution. Bing provides the best imagery here.
96892215	almost 5 years ago	Hi, way/653847214 is causing problems now (oneway=yes) Its the rest of a dual carriage way mapping. I would prefer to restore the previous state.
96876993	almost 5 years ago	Hi, way/442415023 highway=unclassified?
98266153	almost 5 years ago	I think @SColchester is the person to adress https://tasks.hotosm.org/projects/10067
85281455	almost 5 years ago	node/7524131566 not rout able without access tags
97611555	almost 5 years ago	I would consider to tag roads servicing only one or a small group of buildings as "highway=service" Also I would recommend to search and remove all roads and paths shorter then a certain length. (<100m for example - remove bridges and fords from the selection) way/799114559 way/803342041 You can do this easily with the search tool in JOSM. This will remove a lot of the tile mapping artefacts and provide a better staring point for validation.
97611555	almost 5 years ago	@Puxan please give us some examples. like close to here: node/7443624637/history why were this ways drawn at all and who validated here?
96411060	almost 5 years ago	Alternativ kannst du auch den Weg way/888597236 löschen und den Rest wieder verbinden. Dann ist die Rechtsabbiegespur weg. Man kann hier meiner Meinung nach aber zweispurig links abbiegen.
96411060	almost 5 years ago	https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/ROIEN3qQfqVUWbZTxROdGs Achte mal auf die abgenutzten Fahrbahnmarkierungen, die Ampel und auf den Kombi der rechts vorbeifährt.