rab's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 96411060 | almost 5 years ago | Die Abbiegespur nach rechts ist meiner Ansicht nach bei OSM eine Ermessenssache. Nach deiner Bearbeitung sind die Anzahl der destination:lanes und der turn:lanes nun nicht mehr gleich. Das ist definitiv nicht richtig! Ich habe gerade nochmal eine Bildsequenz nach mapillary hochgeladen. Sobald diese veröffentlicht wird, reiche ich einen Link nach. |
| 96411060 | almost 5 years ago | Wenn du es schon nicht lassen kannst dann pass wenigstens die destination:lanes auch entsprechend an. |
| 96411060 | almost 5 years ago | Wobei du von der Sache her eigentlich recht hattest. Ich versuche mich mal in einer etwas detaillierteren Bearbeitung. |
| 96411060 | almost 5 years ago | Hallo Lokalfürst, hör doch bitte mal auf die Lane Attribute ständig durcheinander zu mengen! |
| 94881519 | about 5 years ago | Thank you,
|
| 94881519 | about 5 years ago | Hi, there is still a big gap between way/180798561 and way/180798561. The nodes are still there. I think you should redraw the road manually. At way/180798564 you need to remove the T1 ref tag. |
| 95681158 | about 5 years ago | |
| 95703772 | about 5 years ago | Hello, I have added or corrected some buildings nearby.
|
| 94881519 | about 5 years ago | Something has gone wrong again!
|
| 95681158 | about 5 years ago | Hello, are these house numbers official? The OSM data here is already a little bit aged . The numbers always seem to be continuous to me. But there are some gaps where new buildings were built. Please switch to maxxar background and check e.g. the gap between Z24 and Z25. Or please note that Z31 has disappeared and instead there is a new larger building. |
| 95293076 | about 5 years ago | Hi Quinten, sorry for my bad English. I think we have a big misunderstanding here :). I thought you were about to organize such an event because of your relationship with CartOng and the MSF. |
| 95293076 | about 5 years ago | Hello, it looks to me like you are testing for the next MSF beginner mapping event. Imo, it's extremely difficult to decide what kind of land use predominates in rural areas like here. It is also impossible to make clear distinctions between the different types if there is always a mixture of residential, farming and fallow land. I also believe that such big grey blobs on the map do only have a very distracting look and have no real use. I would prefer to map only the buildings and add place nodes if known. Please check this area here as a bad example of HOT land use mapping.
|
| 94954951 | about 5 years ago | hi,
|
| 93195633 | about 5 years ago | Hello,
|
| 70028946 | about 5 years ago | @Nielkrokodil isn't this function about discussion? But OK, let's stop this here |
| 70028946 | about 5 years ago | Another good example of how either the highway tag Africa guidelines or the way they are applied must be wrong. |
| 70028946 | about 5 years ago | @Nielkrokodil meiner Meinung nach liegst du da ziemlich falsch. Schau dir das mal genau an - die meisten Wege sind auf den aktuellen maxar Bildern längst verschwunden. Ich kann hier nur einen Weg mit einer gewissen Verbindungsfunktion erkennen. Von hier: node/4676497871 nach hier: node/4676772806
@Nielkrokodil in my opinion you are quite wrong. Take a close look - most of the ways have long disappeared on the current maxar pictures. I can only see one way with a certain connection function. From here: node/4676497871 to here: node/4676772806
Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator (free version) |
| 81378118 | about 5 years ago | While redrawing waterways you have damaged a lot of boundary relations here. Please be more careful |
| 92294552 | about 5 years ago | This are not unclassified roads. Not even with this standards:
|
| 83652780 | about 5 years ago | only one example here:
|