tag like here:
way/274466253

#hotosm-project-955 #MissingMaps #RedCross

no one has ever come back to update the data! That means all the work was for nothing and nobody cares

I bet the same will happen to this project

please do not use made up tags like:

ID=25
residential=urban
suburb=riverside
or from Changeset #152393406
school=yes
residential=house

either create a boundary relation or add a simple place node

boundary=administrative

place=*

can you share the the boundarys ?

here are two exsamples in Epworth:

relation/5129306

relation/5129307

Hello Ruthmapper,
@surveyor_jr,

as review_requested is yes

I just removed all of the roads you have mapped in this task. Except of this one:
way/1289077826
this road is only a little bit modified by me.
Please extend this road by following the track until you reach this nodes:
node/11953590749
node/11953590748
Make sure that end of the road is connected.
Tag it as track because it is mostly for agricultural purpose and it is only connected to other tracks. Therefore the classification could not be higher.
Here is the editing link:
osm.org/edit?editor=id&way=1289077826#map=19/-17.33073/30.21341

All the other ways, that were mapped in this task, were judged by the width, only paths. Not really necessary for navigation and planning. But once drawn a burden for all who are trying to keep the map up do date.

to blame:
@Kateregga1
@surveyor_jr
@Letwin

Wouldn't it make more sense to remove most of these roads?

Hallo Ulli,
könntest du bitte zuerst deine Hinterlassenschaften in Sambia aufräumen bevor du hier die Karte auch noch ruinierst

osm.wiki/Conditional_restrictions

Es sollte so passen
Kann sein das restriction:conditional von keepright nicht ausgewertet wird.
grüße
Ralf

Danke,
deprecated since 2013

not bad for a first edit.

However, I would suggest a few small improvements:

1. the main road should always be continuous
node/11492238579
node/11492238583
(on this nodes it should not continue in to dead end driveways)
2. When the road is usable for a car then it should be tagged as track,service,unclassified...
Here it should be most likely highway=service and highway=service + service=driveway for the short parts on private properties.

way/1237326637
way/1237326636
highway=path should be fine here

nanana

Hello,
what was your initial intention with this changeset? All the roads and railroads were already drawn. You should not draw new features over existing ones.
Is there a source for tagging the A5 as an Motorway?
I have reverted your changes for now.
Please let me know if you need any help

way/237214030#map=19/8.96996/11.38936

way/1226921701#map=17/8.96084/11.36062

what is this?
Have you ever checked these AI roads against the background layer?

Residential streets are not so crooked.
Almost always parallel to the gable end
Bing is currently more up-to-date than ESRI

no buildings here! (where is the shadow. compare with
osm.org/edit?editor=id&way=1224594883#map=20/-16.33540/31.15652
)

fence lines and tracks instead of unclassified roads?

more rewarding work can be done here:

osm.org/edit?editor=id&node=4056919450#map=17/-17.88504/31.24082

osm.org/edit?editor=id&node=6203601545#map=16/-17.3350/31.3892

osm.org/edit?editor=id&node=307135034#map=15/-17.3513/31.0648

osm.org/edit?editor=id#map=16/-17.3615/30.9530

my workflow:

Josm with MapWithAI Plugin. Pick only the well detected shapes.

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=142535442

Then do the rest manually with the JOSM building tool

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=142537256

It will still be a tedious job.

https://josm.openstreetmap.de/

Hi,
you should have used esri instead of bing imageary because its much more recent in this area.
I would suggest to look at all available imagery sources before start editing
Should we revert this changeset?

these are no residential roads!

sorry, wrong changeset