OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
38680330 over 9 years ago

way/411469514
if its a building, it should produce some kind of shadow.
compare it with objects nearby
here are some more suspicious candidates:
way/411332893
way/411369937

38643957 over 9 years ago

Its building=yes

38411625 over 9 years ago

tertiary roads on a cemetery?

38383816 over 9 years ago

roads and borderlines should not be interconnected

38358864 over 9 years ago

Do not connect buildings with roads

34212880 over 9 years ago

Hi,
there is a second canadian embassy node in Harare.
node/282873219
Can you tell which is wrong?

38275759 over 9 years ago

relation/6079340/history
way/405625151/history

not a tragedy :-)

38207710 over 9 years ago

Bing imagery was captured mid 2013
That means we dont know exactly how this area is looking like right now.
When splitting the road, you should also add "oneway=yes". (Zimbabwe is a left hand traffic country) Some roads (way/406830846) must be connected to both sides. Please check also the ref tag and the relation membership.

38075809 over 9 years ago

unclassified is definitely wrong

37153632 almost 10 years ago

Please connect this roads

37850397 almost 10 years ago

What are you doing here?
Go back to your Sandbox!

37766949 almost 10 years ago

a straight line is defined by two nodes

37796000 almost 10 years ago

This is what i mean
way/403432299
this road is most likely only a driveway.
Towards the mainroad it looks like there is a kind of gate. Behind the houses it has clearly no connecting character, You should tag it as a track. You missed to connect it to the mainroad and your tile neighbour has not noticed that.

37795226 almost 10 years ago

changeset/37796651
please look beyond the tile borders.
I hope you don't mind

37776311 almost 10 years ago

Hello Susan,
I would like to give you some hints about interpreting Sat images and the area you are mapping.
before adding more data I would check what can be improoved on the existing Features. First most roads have an offset, because the were drawn after previous imagery. Second There is still a highway tagged as "road". You should try to change that to a more reasonable tag. After that you search for the most interesting features in this area. With all the pitches it is most probaly a school (way/403204896) Thats far more interresting than some privat pools.
Here are some things that I would like to see corrected:
You moved that node away from a tree shadow
node/292372748
You connected Kelvedon Avenue with Harlow Avenue. That is correct in principle. But this connection should be tagged as "path" or "footway" You can link also Gosfield Avenue with Maldon Avenue in a similary way.
I wouldnt consider this tracks on the schoolyard as very important, but when adding, I would assume that they are connected underneath the tree.
I hope this will help you with your further edits
rab

37692126 almost 10 years ago

"I wouldn't call them 'expert' as they still don't use changeset comments correctly after 8 years :) "

Thank you for that helpfull comment

37255545 almost 10 years ago

You came back and corrected it yourself.
That's great!

37255545 almost 10 years ago

node/4010169098

a busstop ??

37323194 almost 10 years ago

Use JOSM!
estimate the width of the roads with the measurement plugin.
Tag every road less than 2m as path. Apply "simplify way" to get rid of superfluous nodes

37587030 almost 10 years ago

It will appear on the map when you add a landuse tag.
landuse=farmyard
for exsample