OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
159397965 about 1 year ago

Hi, it looks like the shop is duplicated. Is there a reason why you've added two nodes?

159317621 about 1 year ago

I'd recommend going to tags (at the bottom when you select a feature),
1) restoring
amenity=community_centre
community_centre=cultural_centre
or maybe
community_centre=language_centre

community_centre=*

2) change
school:type=keeltekool
to
training=language

Unfortunately, most map applications categorize feature as a single category, so this will likely be a cultural center or a shop depending on the application.

One way to overcome this could be adding the shop separately, as a new node inside the building and removing shop tags from the cultural center.

I don't think this would be a problem since gas stations often have both gas station feature and a convenience shop feature.

159317621 about 1 year ago

Hi, is Hispaania maja not a community centre anymore? I'm confused that you've removed

amenity=community_centre
community_centre=cultural_centre

159288872 about 1 year ago

Oh, sorry. Didn't notice the second changeset. All is correct! Thank you.

159288872 about 1 year ago

Hi and welcome. disused:shop=* should be used instead of the shop tag.

like this
disused:shop=bakery
name=Blondi Bakery

leaving shop=bakery will make most data consumers (apps) think that the shop still operates.

159009379 about 1 year ago

It's up to the search to support Estonian language and name it correctly, but maybe you can cheat the system, add Hageri in front and say that everyone calls it that. I wouldn't be a big fan of such solution, but it's also hard to say something against it.

159009379 about 1 year ago

Hi, about climbing adventure,
way/1332867876

The name looks like a classification name of what should be in the tags. If you really need to emphasize that it's a low climbing adventure without safety harness, we could invent a new tag.

And maybe it's better to tag it as a pitch, not a sports_centre

158827749 about 1 year ago

Exactly as you've described. Those require non-default conditions and have a default maxspeed sign along with a non-default, conditional one.

106677860 about 1 year ago

thanks, removed

152747442 about 1 year ago

There are nothing on this way/124611773#map=17/59.477632/24.838685 way making it a cycleway. Will change to footway. I'll put bicycle=yes, since it's probably safer than the path closer to the beach where many people walk.

158827749 about 1 year ago

If a client cannot consume correct values, it's a problem with the client, we should not cater to a specific usecase and IMO it's better to use, so to speak, law-safe values. Also, in your use case you still need to change the speed in the winter or you are breaking the law. Speed cameras' locations are irrelevant.

158784870 about 1 year ago

I don't think it's a good idea to add addresses to entrances

158827749 about 1 year ago

Let's, but maybe do it the other way around. Clients not supporting conditional speed shouldn't display higher speed than it is.

158673244 about 1 year ago

way/1329453843

no bicycle=designated tag

158673244 about 1 year ago

It seems you've accidentally changed the direction of this way which made oneway work in incorrect direction
way/1328878990

158673244 about 1 year ago

Also it should be possible to go on bicycle in direction I've indicated with red arrow, but those small two blue places won't allow routing due to them being one-way.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Q2A6dQMYOq1Nzyy8Gm1qWTTl4zvf0Isx/view?usp=sharing

https://scontent-hel3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t39.30808-6/464789610_1075362797628421_7832533533403451347_n.jpg?_nc_cat=102&ccb=1-7&_nc_sid=bd9a62&_nc_ohc=xQ6eR15suSAQ7kNvgHZp2I-&_nc_zt=23&_nc_ht=scontent-hel3-1.xx&_nc_gid=AIJRZAFKuTqBVBwknZGUoXW&oh=00_AYDKCP3iRh2lyESLMrICBEXbRjOq4hmPNRT3oJrrczWnPw&oe=672D2703

158673244 about 1 year ago

Hi,
This is a narrow cycleway, no pedestrian access
way/1329453833
I usually map such cycleways directly on carraigeway with cycleway=track, don't know why I've mapped this one seprately

158592967 about 1 year ago

Hi,
did the cemetery expand to this ground?

If so it's better to make it one cemetery, not two cemeteries near each other with the same name.

You can achieve this in two ways.
1) Remove the new smaller cemetery and expand the bigger one to this new area.
2) If you really don't want to include road in the cemetery, then you can use multipolygons. It's a bit more complex: osm.wiki/Relation:multipolygon
In this case, you'll have both areas as part of multipolygon relation and they both will have "outer" role.

158569462 about 1 year ago

Hi, when specifying tag values, it's better to use consistent names. Otherwise programs can't process this data in a consistent way.

In this case, I'd suggest changing shop's value to just "charity"

Please consult the wiki in such cases.
shop=*

158573541 about 1 year ago

Hi, what you've changed is the whole Village name. Be careful next time, I'll rollback this right away.