thanks, removed

There are nothing on this way/124611773#map=17/59.477632/24.838685 way making it a cycleway. Will change to footway. I'll put bicycle=yes, since it's probably safer than the path closer to the beach where many people walk.

If a client cannot consume correct values, it's a problem with the client, we should not cater to a specific usecase and IMO it's better to use, so to speak, law-safe values. Also, in your use case you still need to change the speed in the winter or you are breaking the law. Speed cameras' locations are irrelevant.

I don't think it's a good idea to add addresses to entrances

Let's, but maybe do it the other way around. Clients not supporting conditional speed shouldn't display higher speed than it is.

way/1329453843

no bicycle=designated tag

It seems you've accidentally changed the direction of this way which made oneway work in incorrect direction
way/1328878990

Also it should be possible to go on bicycle in direction I've indicated with red arrow, but those small two blue places won't allow routing due to them being one-way.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Q2A6dQMYOq1Nzyy8Gm1qWTTl4zvf0Isx/view?usp=sharing

https://scontent-hel3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t39.30808-6/464789610_1075362797628421_7832533533403451347_n.jpg?_nc_cat=102&ccb=1-7&_nc_sid=bd9a62&_nc_ohc=xQ6eR15suSAQ7kNvgHZp2I-&_nc_zt=23&_nc_ht=scontent-hel3-1.xx&_nc_gid=AIJRZAFKuTqBVBwknZGUoXW&oh=00_AYDKCP3iRh2lyESLMrICBEXbRjOq4hmPNRT3oJrrczWnPw&oe=672D2703

Hi,
This is a narrow cycleway, no pedestrian access
way/1329453833
I usually map such cycleways directly on carraigeway with cycleway=track, don't know why I've mapped this one seprately

Hi,
did the cemetery expand to this ground?

If so it's better to make it one cemetery, not two cemeteries near each other with the same name.

You can achieve this in two ways.
1) Remove the new smaller cemetery and expand the bigger one to this new area.
2) If you really don't want to include road in the cemetery, then you can use multipolygons. It's a bit more complex: osm.wiki/Relation:multipolygon
In this case, you'll have both areas as part of multipolygon relation and they both will have "outer" role.

Hi, when specifying tag values, it's better to use consistent names. Otherwise programs can't process this data in a consistent way.

In this case, I'd suggest changing shop's value to just "charity"

Please consult the wiki in such cases.
shop=*

Hi, what you've changed is the whole Village name. Be careful next time, I'll rollback this right away.

Hi
1) Was there a fence added here?

You can also put a barrier=fence or a barrier=gate on a node of the path.

2) There is no need to specify foot and bicycle access if general access is specified.

Please also remove
sport=bowling
tag from the bowling if it's no longer there.
way/79299949

Hi, looks like you've made a bus stop a part of bus pavilion. It's better to put it in the center or in front of it.

Hi, what's this polygon?

Hi, using path is correct for bicycle-pedestrian roads.

More info on mapping cycleways

https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mapping-cycleways-in-estonia/104894

I don't think such roads are tertiary. Could you please just restore the original unclassified?

way/105175248

way/34228373

You are still doing it.

Please make sure the address is correct.

https://xgis.maaamet.ee/adsavalik/ads?ads_oid=EE01684762