There are no explicit signs on the way you've marked as bicycle=no. No other substantial changes in this changeset. I'll rollback it.

wanted to link this changeset instead of a way
changeset/152748009

You didn't even put oneway:bicycle=yes in all places you've removed oneway from. Please be more diligent.

Please don't change highway=path to highway=cycleway. It's an alternative tagging scheme preferred by many cycling infrastructure mappers.

More information
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mapping-cycleways-in-estonia/104894

Hi, there is no such thing in Estonian traffic law. I'll rollback this change.

Hm, both ways now allow cycling.

I guess the confusion comes from this change to highway=footway

way/979875286

I'll fix the sidewalk back to highway=path and remove your change.

Hi, please don't change paths designated to bicycles to
highway=footway.

Also, keep in mind that foot traffic must use a separate tag from oneway, foot:backward=* and such your change is not really necessary.

IMO such micromapping creates too much clutter. I'd stick to using a single way when cycleway and a sidewalk are not physically separated.

Hi, I've surveyed and added

motor_vehicle=private
motor_vehicle:conditional=destination @ delivery

Also added a bollard on one side.

Hi, ways to private houses should be highway=service, they can also additionally be service=driveway.

In Estonia, we mostly use highway=unclassified for more prominent roads which are not residential.

highway=service

I've just added that bench you've deleted :P

Will restore..

actually, the conditional one is already there. I've changed maxspeed back to 90

Hi, the 100 speed limit is probably the summer time one, right?

OpenStreetMap is not about changing values back-and-forth. Many applications also work offline.

I'd recommend adding the summer speed limit as a separate tag like
maxspeed:conditional=110 @ (Apr 1-Oct 31)
and having the usual maxspeed as
maxspeed=90

I don't know what the dates should be exactly, but they should be taken conservatively. Better to show lower speed limit than a higher one.

I'm not sure that tram tracks need a name and if the extent of track to which it applies isn't just related to construction stage and afterwards will be forgotten.

Personally I prefer natural=wood as it's better supported by data consumers. Last time I checked landcover received a lot criticism and I'm not sure the whole community is ready to accept it.

It won't hurt if booth tagging schemes would be on the same polygon.

I've removed this campsite and "playground" feature near the tunnel under train tracks.

I've also removed a name from a dumpster and fixed bridge ruins' name.

If you plan to contribute to OSM, check out the wiki osm.wiki/Beginners'_guide

Please don't add unverifiable stuff, don't add things already mapped, like that tunnel. Don't add names to places which aren't officially named and keep the main name in a local language.

Hi, please stop. You are editing map for everyone, not just yourself. I'll remove your edits.

Hi, good work.
"gravel" roads in Estonia are usually not surface=gravel, but surface=compacted.

See pictures at the bottom
surface=gravel

change it to motor_vehicle=private if it's for vehicles only

Hi, you've made a service way near the river access=private. This forbids pedestrian and bicycle routing there which I think was not your intention.