qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 144318460 | about 2 years ago | Paths are used by all routers I know of which support cycling routing since it's an old convention. Do you have an example of router which doesn't? I think Komoot, organicmaps, brouter, osmand all support paths. I'm not up for reverting things back and forth without a reason. It's not incorrect, but also not more correct. |
| 144328163 | about 2 years ago | *on the ground |
| 144328163 | about 2 years ago | Tallinn's map is a fantasy map. In the ground bridge connection to the western part is not designated at all. |
| 144318460 | about 2 years ago | Hi, please don't change
highway=path is regarded as a more correct value for combined bicycle-pedestrian paths by some mappers and we don't want edit wars. Here are some tips on mapping cycleways in Estonia https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mapping-cycleways-in-estonia/104894/4 |
| 144318739 | about 2 years ago | Please always check for warnings before saving. On the junction you've changed here node/81587170#map=19/59.31236/24.63114 cycleway is not connected to carrigeways it crosses. No routing software would be able to plot a route with a switch from cycleway to carrigeway or vice versa |
| 144328163 | about 2 years ago | Is bridge over Ehitajate tee really a cycleway? I don't remember any signs there. Western descent from it is definitely not designated and may proove challenging for some people and some tires. |
| 144332987 | about 2 years ago | Nice! When editing, make sure you aren't removing some else's work and details. Here, crossing-related tags were removed. Multiple footway=sidewalk were removed. It's ok to leave them even if it's not a "footway" anymore. |
| 144312186 | about 2 years ago | Has anything been changed here? aerial imagery from March suggests that everything is in place https://fotoladu.maaamet.ee/etak.php?B=59.35221346053511&L=24.61018345038208&fotoladu |
| 144328163 | about 2 years ago | Hi, adding name to this path
|
| 40008142 | about 2 years ago | Hi, do you know if this can be deleted?
|
| 43170754 | about 2 years ago | Hi, do you know if this can be deleted?
|
| 144255275 | about 2 years ago | Hi, does the Uus turg area behind Estonia really count as Tammsaare park? What's the source for this? |
| 144217535 | about 2 years ago | also, please avoid changing paths to cycleways for combined bicycle-pedestrian paths |
| 144217535 | about 2 years ago | Hi, accidental ford here
|
| 144240652 | about 2 years ago | Hi, you've accidentally made this building a 123-storey tower |
| 144151140 | about 2 years ago | And maybe I'd remove
|
| 144151140 | about 2 years ago | * I doesn't GET as wet and sticky as dirt. |
| 144151140 | about 2 years ago | I think dirt is incorrect. Surface on such tracks is usually woodchips or woodchips with fine gravel and ground. I doesn't as wet and sticky as dirt. I've also wondered if such tracks should be tagged as In the end I've decided not to add it at all for simplicity, but what do you think? There are more of them around here. |
| 144136809 | about 2 years ago | I guess 20 was supposed to be a maxspeed |
| 133950594 | about 2 years ago | The building outline should be also changed to include all of the parts. |