This is a building address. Street names are on separate signs, usually near junctions, and don't include house numbers.
For bigger streets it's usually hard to find them, only on turning directions https://www.google.com/maps/@59.400727,24.6944814,3a,23.1y,50.16h,122.51t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sQ_k_fy1Iy3i963LqFcU7WA!2e0!6shttps:%2F%2Fstreetviewpixels-pa.googleapis.com%2Fv1%2Fthumbnail%3Fpanoid%3DQ_k_fy1Iy3i963LqFcU7WA%26cb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile.gps%26w%3D203%26h%3D100%26yaw%3D302.63907%26pitch%3D0%26thumbfov%3D100!7i16384!8i8192?entry=ttu

Smaller streets have them more often, but also not always https://www.google.com/maps/@59.4169814,24.7155132,3a,15y,95.07h,81.47t/data=!3m10!1e1!3m8!1sVxB28bjzY8UquLmrY6sBtA!2e0!6shttps:%2F%2Fstreetviewpixels-pa.googleapis.com%2Fv1%2Fthumbnail%3Fpanoid%3DVxB28bjzY8UquLmrY6sBtA%26cb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile.gps%26w%3D203%26h%3D100%26yaw%3D320.88705%26pitch%3D0%26thumbfov%3D100!7i13312!8i6656!9m2!1b1!2i29?entry=ttu

Good catch, I've reverted the changeset. Not all questions in StreetComplete can and should be answered, but I think in this case there is a way to choose option that the street has no name.

Hi, there is a fence there visible on aerials.

Hi, please try to upload changes in different areas of the world separately.

Also,
way/1019278268
looks broken

Hi, it's not enough to set an address, the node has to be actually moved to the new location or a new one should be created. Better to do that on osm.org than in OsmAnd. I've moved the shop to the new address and added shop=leather tag. See if it's correct. node/6567873661

There is some useful stuff. Would be cool if the author corrected them by removing names if they don't know them, removing personal items like "land for sale" and checking amenity types it.

But yes, in this state this should be reverted.

And there is now a duplicate car wash - one is a building and the other one is a node

Hi, please don't connect things to roads, it makes it difficult to edit later. Especially buildings, which are definitely not connected to roads in any way.

This area has been updated and aerial imagery is outdated. Please check the the date of changes before breaking things. I'll revert this changeset.

*the area

Hi, try not to create such geographically big changesets next time. They show up for everyone who monitors the are in between and it's also harder to see where exactly the change happened. Better split them into smaller ones.

Hi, Vadim678
The whole Pärnu beach is definitely not a ladies' beach. Ladies' beach is probably just a small part of it. I'll revert the change.

* "from now granular" = "from more granular"

Ok. For me gravel is just mostly lose rocks, difficult to ride a bicycle. Compacted may have some loose gravel, but there is always a more solid base which is compacted from now granular material. It maybe shaky and uncomfortable, but not difficult to ride a bicycle and hard to loose balance. But that is my understanding.

Hi and welcome!
Make sure these are actually gravel roads. What we often call gravel road is not a gravel road in OSM! In Estonia they are usually compacted.

See
:Examples with notes" here surface=gravel

And "compacted" here surface=*

Please update the surface if it's compacted. Thank you!

It seems "right of way" definition created some confusion.

From Google translate:

1) the legal right, established by usage or grant, to pass along a specific route through grounds or property belonging to another.

2) the legal right of a pedestrian, vehicle, or ship to proceed with precedence over others in a particular situation or place.

You are interpreting what's described with "right of way" as the second definition, while it's the first one in case of your wiki quote.

Access tags are about access, no double meaning.

I'll repeat again: priority does not matter in this case.

We understand the law the same way, we have different understanding of access tags. Please try to understand the whole context of the wiki article, not a single phrase from it
access=*

Hi, you shouldn't add names to roads just because some tool complains about them being unnamed. You should mark it as false-positive in that tool. I'm talking about
way/213116026

Can you please link the place where it's written that they relate to right of way? In my understanding they relate to being allowed to traverse the way, not that everyone should yield for you.

access tags are not related to the right of way.

dismount is a big no from me. You don't have to dismount and in practice it's not required. We aren't mapping right of way here. It's going to impede routing a lot.

My suggestion is simple
1) If the we are connecting footways without bicycle access tags, we shouldn't care about bicycle access on a crossing, no need to add it.
2) If we are connecting ways with bicycle access and it's a usual zebra, we add bicycle=yes
3) If we are connecting ways with bicycle access and it's marked with one of the three ways bicycle-pedestrian crossing is marked, then it's bicycle=designated

The advantage of this is that you can see everything from aerial imagery.

This is of course if crossing is mapped separately at all.

About unmarked crossings, they aren't that often mapped as separate ways, but if they are, I think they usually should inherit access tags from connecting ways. Unless it's a crossing with high kerbs, probably not a bicycle=designated.

In the example I've linked way/1115986757 I wouldn't add any bicycle=* tags