Here are ways named by this user which match with Google Maps, but you wouldn't have any idea of how to name them on the ground and there is no such data on maa-amet.

way/49953815#map=17/59.43680/24.82379
way/628927061
way/639165721

Here are other changesets which are very similar to the current one
changeset/123204834
changeset/123097908
(here Google doesn't have street names)

And there are many more which name small connecting parts of the road. way/28812875

Google maps loves to name adjacent roads by the street name. I sure hope Tobias1996 doesn't use it as a source.

Is this really classified as a pedestrian street? "autoliiklus on lubatud ainult üksikutel tundidel päevas" There are no cars allowed there at all. Only cars I've seen there are maintenance cars with flashing lights.

This tagging confuses cyclemap and cyclosm. Not sure it's a good idea. These roads do not feel like a street to a pedestrian. I think this tag is more for a street which looks like somewhere where the cars could move, but they are forbidden.

Hi, please don't forget to add addr:city

This is definitely a surface parking, not a street-side

What's Pepe?

I meant that paths are often managed and choosing between a footway and a path should not be done based on it. Footways should only be chosen if cycling is not allowed there. Paths are versatile and allow to map all kinds of non-car roads by combination with other tags.

Just wanted to add that this "managed" argument is IMO should not be taken into account. It's common to tag combined bicycle/pedestrian paths as a highway=path with foot and bicycle=designated and actually more preferred to highway=cycleway by some data consumers. These ways are managed, but are still highway=paths.

Actually, nevermind, my mistake. I've looked only at one direction. The other direction shows route through now non-existent road and it's obviously not updated.

Sorry, strange website. It's about 318. https://web.peatus.ee/ in the first field select route and type 318. In Rakvere it seems to take a more straight route if this website is correct. I have not verified it.

Not sure if it's correct, but the route here is different
https://web.peatus.ee/linjat/estonia:8430eec841b988beacb10d0011e9bc9f/aikataulu/estonia:8430eec841b988beacb10d0011e9bc9f::02

Looks like the toilet building at the northern entrance got buried under the pedestrian area.

Hi, you seem to have accidentally removed building=yes tag. It's still a buliding. The social_facility does not assume that it's a building and is usually drawn around the whole campus (I often use maa-amet's cadastral map for this)

Maybe footways should have been changed to paths instead of bicycle=yes? I think it would be enough for mtb routers and renderers like cyclosm.

Just noticed that id editor actually saves your Strava key under imagery_used. Not sure if it can be used somehow, but just so you know. You can remove it under "Tags" section when uploading.

Hello, name tags are not for addresses

Hi, you don't really need to put oneway=no on the roads. They are not oneway by default.

Hi, Aulo.
You may want to consider using
highway=service
service=driveway
surface=unpaved or ground

instead of highway=track for driveways. Tracks are for accessing land, service roads are for accessing buildings.

Hi, do you mind adding parking=street_side to parkings like this? Those P's are quite dominating the view currently, street_side's P's are at least smaller in the default renderer.

changeset/129635785