qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 129064056 | about 3 years ago | The same goes for changeset/129062996 |
| 129064056 | about 3 years ago | Hi, I see tags like crossing=traffic_signals
on many crossings and nothing says that a pedestrian can use it. |
| 128906646 | about 3 years ago | Hi, thanks for your contribution, but buildings should not overlap each other. If there is no 21/1 building anymore, then it should be deleted. |
| 127626248 | about 3 years ago | Hi,
access=permit
since it's not available without an app and the type is not just a stand, but something else? I haven't documented it in the wiki, but there a few bikeep parkings I've already did with these tags. Oh, and operator:type should be private, since bikeep is not a governmental organization. |
| 128851214 | about 3 years ago | >Generally, even if some of them are gone in reality, I think having partly outdated paths from Maa-amet on the map is much better than lacking them, as it is now. Not sure, I woudn't like to discover that there actually is no trail. Just a few days ago I saw a cutline in the forest on Maa-amet's map which was missing on the ground. We already have Maa-amet's map, not sure that copy-pasting everything from there is a great idea. I'd suggest to at least verify paths
|
| 128846163 | about 3 years ago | >Btw are you going to GIS päev in Tartu tomorrow? nope |
| 128846163 | about 3 years ago | But don't blindly believe me :)
Btw, does everydoor allow custom comments? It lists what you've done, but sometimes it's important why. The comment about deleted cinema and a concert hall is what looked suspicious to me. |
| 128851214 | about 3 years ago | Hi, how can you be sure that all of these paths actually exist on the ground? |
| 128846163 | about 3 years ago | I see that this was an attempt to remove duplicates. 1) For the concert hall we currently have a relation, a room at level -2 with it's own tags and a node which you modified. The relation isn't really pickup up by indoor= or openlevelup, so we'd need to keep something in addition to relation. I think we can remove the node as it having was:*** tag doesn't help in any way. 2) The cinema had 2 rooms without a relation and if I'm not mistaken you "removed" the room with the entrance. I don't think that's a good idea as it might confuse someone searching for the entrance. |
| 128846163 | about 3 years ago | Did Apollo cinema and Alexela concert hall really close? |
| 128721841 | about 3 years ago | Hello, I don't get it. The shop's name is House. |
| 128307675 | about 3 years ago | Hi,
|
| 128281941 | about 3 years ago | Hi, you may want to use highway=path for forest paths instead of footway. Many apps like Organic Maps look at the highway type before surface. Forest paths can be used by cyclists, while footway in many countries mean that they aren't legally allowed there. |
| 127744153 | about 3 years ago | Just FYI Aulo got a blocking message and instead of replying created a new account @Naya%20Kabir
|
| 126137248 | over 3 years ago | Hi,
I can restore it, but I'd like to know what exactly happened here. |
| 126616691 | over 3 years ago | Will change
|
| 126674216 | over 3 years ago | Please use addr: tags for addresses. Name tag should not be used for addresses.
in this case it should probably be
|
| 126543145 | over 3 years ago | Please don't add same information on the building and as separate node inside the building. Will remove it from the building. |
| 124451074 | over 3 years ago | Hi, do you think access=private could be added to the gate? I assume it's better supported by routers. |
| 126621894 | over 3 years ago | Dealing with a router developer is definitely the correct way, since the new ways created in iD are not supported. I've seen quite a few changes from path to cycleway in Estonia. As long as it's not standardized, all these changes are pointless. Btw, iD still shows "path" and "sidewalk" for me. |