Thank you for clarification

Hi, just checking. Was the graffiti removed/cover by insulation?

Hi, there is nothing in the data which would help consumers (apps and maps) to understand what it is. It will be ignored.

Consider adding relevant tags (at the bottom when you select the node), like

amenity=lounge

and more

amenity=lounge

Thanks. Looks like the user interface is not very friendly and it expects that you first input the name, then wikidata. (or just use tags)

Hi, nice edits.
Since you are linking wiki articles with a name, it would be useful if you also added the name of the lake to OSM.

thanks, fixed

The train station belongs to GO property. Bus stops are on municipal ground. They are not one and the same thing.

What I'm afraid of is that this may mislead some tourist, since we actually have one main bus station in Tallinn.

At least the name is incorrect. There is no such bus station, only bus stops.

I hope someone else expresses their opinion on this topic.

Shouldn't Balti jaam refer to the train station? How is this a bus station? Can you buy long distance ticket here? Have I missed something? IMO Bussijaam at Lastekodu/Juhkentali should remain the only bus station to avoid confusion.

It would be nice if we had a generally accepted way of putting such stuff into one place (relation).

Judging by this discussion, we actually don't and not everyone agrees on what route=road even means
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/streets-as-street-relations/106436

added building=tower

Hi and welcome! Really good first edits.

I wanted to clarify, why is Sütemetsa tee marked as motor_vehicle=no? Is it intentional?

Hi,
surface=ground
gives more information than
surface=unpaved

unpaved and paved values are very general ones.

Was surface=ground incorrect?

@Kayo_33 please note that not every StreetComplete quest is correct and requires an answer.

Hi, there is no concrete rule. You could either decide that you want the default as maxspeed and since the sign is conditional to have conditional:maxspeed. Or you could put maxspeed as 70 and add a conditional for 90 - at least this won't suggest to break the law for consumers which don't support conditionals.

If it was a condition which is applied rarely, I'd definitely put it in conditional:maxspeed.

You should at least add the default speed (90?) as maxspeed if you leave the conditional as 70.

I also suggest removing ;Sa off;Su off - I think these are not required.

Some context if someone stumbles upon these comments:

https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=58.18305939999698&lng=25.50511080000001&z=18.531688264196713&pKey=293992547065552&focus=photo&x=0.5808639655721334&y=0.47141229429312625&zoom=2.0930232558139537

landuse=winter_sports should be used instead of landuse=commercial

I don't think OSM carto cares about layers unless it's roads. I think it has internal layers by which drawing order is determined and if they are on the same layer, smaller things are drawn on top of bigger. Seems that it's not the case here.

You could use multipolygon to carve out that flowerbed from the pedestrian area.
1) Make a multipolygon for pedestrian area, with outer role
2) Move pedestrian area tags to multipolygon
3) add flowerbed as inner part of the multipolygon

osm.wiki/Relation:multipolygon

This will make a hole in the pedestrian area, flower bed will be seen through it.

Hi, please use commonly known tag values where possible. Otherwise consumers won't know what to do with them. Most routers will likely avoid routing through unknown highway type.

For parking lot, use highway=service where cars can drive, then you can connect footpaths to them for routing.

I've updated the parking lot, check it out.

Looks like it's fixed

You probably wanted to connect this to another path way/1340855959

I'd avoid using
access=employees. Not a popular tag unlikely to be understood by consumers. IMO access=private covers the usage good enough.