https://xgis.maaamet.ee/adsavalik/ads?ads_oid=ME03064246

Hi, even a shed can have an address. Don't delete unless you're sure.

removed them

Hi, those are not natural and man-made. Names are not meant for description.

I propose you delete those. Bunker can probably be mapped as an underground building.

Hi, please check what the tags mean before adding them
building=terrace

It's not a building if there are no walls and no roof.

Merivälja Südamekodu:

Now Merivälja Südamekodu exists in two instances, this is incorrect. If you think that the area is incorrect, remove it. Otherwise remove the node. I think there was car repair service on the same grounds, but if they are accessible to elderly, I think it's ok to leave the area and delete the new node.

Pirita:

You've deleted the building for some reason. You can restore it by selecting the area and then either clicking on "area" at the top left and selecting a "building" there.

Or go the tags section in the bottom left and add building=yes and remove area=yes.

Hi, please don't add things which are yet not there.

Tartu Südamekodu avab uksed septembris 2024.

There is a way to add such things for the future, which will be ignored by most data consumers. I'll mark it as planned

osm.wiki/Lifecycle_prefix

Hi, something really wrong here
1)is there no building here anymore? I see that building=yes was removed and area=yes was added. Is this a mistake? If so, add building=yes
2) You need to add amenity=social_facility (or just select it from the list at the top left) for the data to be consumed correctly

Hi, if possible, please upload changes in different countries separately in the future, thank you!

Hi, good edit, but I think it's better to remove the hotel name from the building. We don't map the same thing twice in OpenStreetMap. It already exists as a node with a correct tourism=hotel tag, while the name on the building without such tag is... just the name of the building. Since here is a mess of connected buildings which have different shapes from Maa-amet, this would lead to less confusion.

Hi, please use Maa-amet's imagery in Estonia. It's usually very precise. There is currently an offset to it.

I assume it's an attempt to fix note/4270175 ?

not really sure about these gardens. not everything inside private property is a garden and especially not the land underneath the house.

Hi, good detailing, but please don't remove ways inside parking lots. It allows to use routing software.

Nice.

If you're in the area, could you please check what kind of sign/road marking is here at the beginning of the "Peedu kergliiklustee"? The name suggests that bicycles should be allowed there, but access tags on it are confusing with only foot=designated

note/4230929

Yes, it's subjective. There is a oneway:bicycle=no, to account for direction, but I've noticed that wiki suggests using cycleway:right:oneway=no which is probably not supported by many apps. So, to avoid confusion, maybe it's better as a separate way.

Hi, cycleway:right=track was put in with a goal to show that it's directly adjacent to the carriageway and not protected from the cars. I'm not really against something mapped your way, but in OSM it's better not to break things for each other or we'll have edit wars.

But there is an actual problem here too. You shouldn't have added bicycle=use_sidepath. Access tags are about the law and there is nothing prohibiting cyclists from using the carriageway (sõidutee). In Estonia, bicycle=use_sidepath is not applicable, please remove it.

Hi, please don't change bicycle-pedestrian paths to footways. More information on mapping cycling infrastructure:
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mapping-cycleways-in-estonia/104894

Hi, I've removed the duplicate building you've created.

Hi and welcome!

You don't have to add names to everything. Paths usually don't have names. Mostly, we try to keep things more or less in sync with Maa-amet (land board) and road registry in Estonia.

With exceptions when there are signs on the ground which specify the name of a path or a forest path having a distinct name from being a known trail for training or being advertised with such name. I guess Peedu kergliiklustee along the tracks nearby is one of such cases.

Consider removing Tuletõrje and Oja names from paths.

Yes, you can remove them