Thank you for your review @Cookie Guru and thanks for the edits @Fatimah Abanur. If you provide more details, we would be happy to help get this mapped correctly.

Looks like you swapped the building and address unit tags on the node and building. I switched those around for you, thanks for the info!

It doesn't look like address coverage is very good in this apartment complex (though it's generally fairly good within Seattle, so I'm not sure what happened here). That unfortunately means the delivery drivers' maps might not be using OpenStreetMap (though they might be combining OSM with another data source...), so I'm not sure this will drastically improve your delivery service.

But thanks for the contribution anyway! Welcome to OpenStreetMap!

Hey there! I haven't gone through and done a full review, but these changes look okay so far. That said, in the future, it's helpful for other mappers if you try to keep the changes you make in a single changeset within a relatively small area, and limit the number of changes in a changeset.

Are you new to OpenStreetMap?

Happy mapping!

Several months later, as a more experienced mapper, I now realize that this changeset was in error: micro-mapping of parking stalls is a real thing. Sorry!

changeset/171857575

haha, it took a while for somebody to notice way/1414386787 (see note/4952611). But please don't map made-up things in the future, we don't want to start a trend of vandalism.

No problem! Awesome job on adding all these buildings etc. Anthon is looking great!

Nice work on all the mapping around Anthon! One point of feedback: on the Cenex gas station, since it's one feature, the two separate roofs shouldn't each have the station info. I moved that to a separate way way/1428209214

Happy mapping!

Cool, this looks good to me. Feel free to reach out with any questions. Thanks for the contribution, and welcome to OpenStreetMap!

Your edit looks good, thanks! This is helpful info that sometimes gets missed.
Welcome to OpenStreetMap!

Whoops, that's not quite what I wanted the reverter to do. I'll do the rest manually.

Thanks for the contributions. Isn't this building a house, though? I know the other buildings surrounding are mostly just tagged as generic "buildings," but that's only because nobody's checked what kind of building they are yet. Please feel free to change any houses tagged as buildings to be mapped as houses instead.

Thanks again, and welcome to OpenStreetMap!

Hey @Felix borges! The building you edited looks like an apartment building to me. Can you confirm that you chose the correct building (and whether the business fills the entire building or is just located within it)? Thanks!

This looks like a private driveway. Not sure if it connects through to the alleyway though. County iMap also does not display it.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170686180

This moved a stop sign (node/6611132085) out of position. Fixed!

changeset/170909401

@Glassman Looks like the church was recently marked as demolished[way/228764315/history/6] and in a construction site[way/1422502654].

Also the moving company seems to have a lot of incorrect tags (e.g. not a commercial building, and the address belongs to the nearby house).

I'm going to revert this and add the moving company back, unless you have further comments.

@Fatimah Abanur is the church you added back really not demolished? More context will help us make sure this is mapped correctly.

Good to know, thanks @Glassman.

Good catch, thanks for pointing this out & editing! I've also added an `access=private` tag just to make it clear to data consumers that this is not for public access.

Thanks again, and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Feel free to leave a comment here if you have any questions or are interested in getting more involved with OpenStreetMap!

Thanks for the contribution.

OpenStreetMap is an open database, however, we cannot add data to the map from other, copyrighted sources. I noticed that you marked your source for this edit as USPS, which is not to my knowledge available for use in OpenStreetMap. If you did indeed copy from a copyrighted source, please let us know so we can remove that data from the database. See osm.wiki/Beginners_Guide_1.1#Don't_use_copyrighted_information for more info.

Additionally, I noticed that you updated the house type to `house=town_house`. The correct, community accepted tag for individual townhouse units is `house=terraced`, as seen in the official wiki: osm.wiki/Tag%3Ahouse%3Dterraced. Could you please update the tag to `house=terraced`?

But thanks again for the contributions, and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Please feel free to ask any questions here.

Thanks for the contribution. In the future, could you please add a meaningful changeset comments so other mappers can more easily understand the purpose and intended scope of your changes?

Please read osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments, and leave a message here if you have any questions.

Thanks!

Sorry for not getting back to you on this one.

I guess the main thing is we don't want mappers making up names for things to describe them. I'm not super experienced on the convention here, but I think if these names are used in official contexts (like the Seattle Parks & Rec site you linked), it's probably fine.

Thanks again!