Looks good to me, thank you for the edit! Adding these kinds of small details are what make OpenStreetMap data so good.

I also added the parking lot and drive-through lanes, because that's fun :)

Feel free to ask any questions here. I plan to look over your other changes later. Thanks again, and welcome to OpenStreetMap!

Welcome to OpenStreetMap! We do not allow SEO content to be added to the database. If your business has a publicly-available, walk-in location, we can help you add it to the map. Otherwise, OpenStreetMap does not intend to map online-only services.

I've removed both of your edits.

Please let me know if you have any questions. Thanks!

Thank you! Business details are very helpful for OpenStreetMap.

The one change I made was to standardize the telephone number format to `+1-206-588-0379`. It's unusual to see that format around here, but it does help international users of OpenStreetMap data to properly parse the number. This is a minor detail though, and the other changes look OK.

Thanks again for contributing. Please feel free to ask any questions here. Welcome to OpenStreetMap!

Looks okay to me, thanks for adding this! Local contributors with on-the-ground knowledge are what lets OpenStreetMap data be so useful for so many different applications.

If you're interested in learning more about contributing to OpenStreetMap, please see osm.wiki/Beginners%27_guide or feel free to ask any questions here.

Thanks again and welcome to OpenStreetMap!

Thanks. Lane tagging is helpful. My main feedback is that it's important to be aware about how long the segment of road you're editing is. Unless the entire segment of roadway has a turn lane, you'll need to split the road line into separate segments where the turn lane starts or ends.

In the iD editor, this can be done by creating/finding the point on the roadway line where the lane configuration changes (double-click the line if the point doesn't already exist). Then select that point where you want to split the road segment, and hit the "X" key (or right click > "split way"). Then you can edit the tags separately for the different segments of road.

But thanks anyway, these edits are useful! Let me know if you have any questions.

Awesome, thanks for the edit! Based on aerial imagery, it looks like that 3rd lane is a center turn lane, like it is south of the segment you edited. I added some more tags to indicate a center lane, but let me know if that's not the case anymore.

Thanks again, and welcome to OpenStreetMap!

Note: more than 7 mapwithai-derived features in this changeset. The JOSM plugin had trouble with tags when uploading to an existing changeset.

Thanks for the contribution. Is "Consign Design" furniture shop still here, or was it replaced?

Okay, I moved leisure=playground to the line and deleted the relation. In my experience iD often isn't great about adding unnecessary relations automatically. I think this sometimes happens when you hit "combine features" with an area selected. Not sure.

Happy mapping!

Awesome, thank you for confirming. I updated the business.

Happy mapping!

Thanks. The menu you linked suggests that this place might be called "OMG! Burger"

Could you review this?

Thanks, welcome to OpenStreetMap!

Hey, I noticed that you mapped the playground as a single-member multipolygon relation, and the outer line as a sand surface. Was that intentional, and if so why? Can't you apply the playground tags directly to the way, along with surface=sand? Or am I missing something?

Thanks!

Hey there! Thanks for all the contributions you've been making.

Your changeset comment caught my attention because you mentioned "street view". To clarify, Google's Street View unfortunately cannot be used to add data to OpenStreetMap under most circumstances due to licensing concerns.

However, Microsoft has granted permission for Bing Streetside imagery to be used for OpenStreetMap. iD can show Bing imagery within the editor (Map Data > Photo Overlays > Bing Streetside).

Can you confirm whether or not you are using Google-owned imagery? Or are you referring to Bing imagery as Street View?

Please see osm.wiki/Legal_FAQ#Contributing for more info.

Thanks again for the contributions, and welcome to OpenStreetMap!

Oh, never mind, this looks like it was fixed. I had the wrong changeset number. My apologies.

I updated this trail to abandoned:highway=path.

Thanks! If the trail is still there, though, it probably should be replaced with a disused:highway=path or abandoned:highway=path tag instead. That way, OpenStreetMap will be true to what is on the ground (one of the policies), while also not displaying the trail in most renderers. See osm.wiki/Why_can%27t_I_delete_this_trail%3F for further reading if you're interested.

Thanks again for your contribution, and please let me know if you have any questions!

Hey @VLD280, what leads you to believe this is an informal crosswalk? It looks like a legal crosswalk to me.

Thank you for the information, this looks good! Welcome to OpenStreetMap!

Thank you for this information. Contributions from locals with local knowledge are very valuable for improving the map.

Since this is an abandoned trail, not a removed one, it's more appropriate to mark is as abandoned (abandoned:highway)=* than to delete it. I've added the trail back as an abandoned trail.

Please see osm.wiki/Why_can%27t_I_delete_this_trail%3F and osm.wiki/Lifecycle_prefix for more info, and feel free to ask any questions here.

Thanks again, and welcome to OpenStreetMap!

Thank you for your concern about the local environment. However, deleting a trail in OpenStreetMap is unfortunately not the correct way to address this issue.

Is this trail publicly owned/operated (i.e. managed by the local government), or is this private property? Depending on the situation on the ground, there may be better ways to help this issue.

Please see osm.wiki/Why_can%27t_I_delete_this_trail%3F for more information.

Thank you for your cooperation.