This time, I tried to do something new and took to improving road network and buildings in two areas that are probably very different from each other in terms of the dynamics or the urban set up. But both had one thing in common, clusters. The settlements were clustered and packed and hence, it proved to be a challenging task editing both Ranchi and Dehradun
Road tracing in Ranchi was tough mainly because of its congested built up.
From the satellite data, it was pretty clear that the capital city of Jharkand is clustered. The settlements were packed. But there was also a lot of open space. It was easy to make out highways and tracks but difficult to decipher where the residential roads were due to the mass build up of residential settlements.

Things that I noticed
- The settlements are so clustered that it was difficult to make out where the roads are.
- Some of the streets had already been marked though none of them had the right tags. Some of the streets had been marked wrongly.
- Some of the roads were placed where there were no roads.
- Some of the roads had been joined with the adjacent land-use or buildings.
Before and After

Building tracing in Dehradun was slightly more challenging than road tracing.

This task demanded keen eye for detail and how much of it one is able to process. One issue that one might face when tracing buildings in India is irregularity or dissimilarity. The settlements are so diversely built that it becomes hard to be consistent while tracing the shape of the building as the settlement built up dynamics change every now and then.
Things that I noticed
- Satellite imagery was not so clear in some parts which made it hard to detail.
- The buildings were so close to each other that it became a little difficult to trace the outlines.
- Buildings which have different shapes takes longer time to edit.
Before and After


Road tracing and building tracing broadened my perspective about mapping and gave me a fantastic chance to try and learn how the cities are built. It is very interesting to study the dynamics of urbanisation and how cities are planned.
But most importantly, it provided me with an in depth analysis of how important data is and how crucial it is to add right data. It’s not the quantity but the quality. It is not about a race of how many roads you have added or how many buildings you have traced. What is more important is the fact that there are so many people out there who are dependent on the data you are updating and it is a responsibility to make sure that we don’t mess it up. A node unconnected or a building connected to the road can make a huge difference and it is scary to think the amount of repercussions it can cause.
Well, what more can I say. Happy Mapping :D :D
Discussion
Comment from Warin61 on 31 March 2016 at 00:09
You will also have the occasional cloud … a different image provider can help, though usually you would be using the one with the best resolution so the second one won’t be as good.
I usually use bing, with mapbox being the secondary image provider. Hoping for cloud free images, or at least one cloud free.
Comment from PlaneMad on 31 March 2016 at 05:45
One of the very interesting observations in Indian cities were they all evolved from little villages or grew around a fort a large temple. The patterns of streets and buildings are organic and radiate along directions that are the shortest path to the next village or settlement.
This is very different from the gridded cities of US, where the convenience of the planner took precedence over the plan or aspirations of the residents.
Comment from andy mackey on 31 March 2016 at 08:14
Walking may be too slow for some but walking with a notebook, a camera and a gps is the best. Bing in some areas is excellent but it is impossible to tell if some paths and roads are actually connected. does that walk way join two roads? is the road a cul de sac or not? While you are doing that you will get some fresh air and exercise, meet some lovely people and see some interesting things. Arm chair mapping is ok but only after you have been on the ground. You will also have a GPX trace that can be used to check Bing alignment. Happy Mapping.
Comment from poornibadrinath on 2 April 2016 at 13:25
@Warin61: When dealing with satellite data one is bound to encounter clouds but yes, it is always good to refer to another source, just to be sure :)
@andymackey: Nothing beats field mapping. Agree with you :)
@PlaneMad: yes, radial settlements have a pattern, starting from a single point and spreading outward but it is always harder to understand the pattern because of the irregularity in their growth. Unlike grids, there is no specific direction in which they develop. :) well, anyway that is the beauty of radial settlements.