OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
158840783 about 1 year ago

Revert of changeset/158774212

158774212 about 1 year ago

Reverted by changeset/158840783

158847515 about 1 year ago

Revert of changeset/158847305

158847305 about 1 year ago

Reverted by changeset/158847515

158797291 about 1 year ago

Reverted by

changeset/158829460

158798266 about 1 year ago

Thank you for your private message and for confirming that the data was intentionally deleted.

However, I still hold a differing perspective. If the streets and buildings are visible in the aerial image, they should be represented in the OSM database.

158792274 about 1 year ago

Revert of changeset/158792189

158792189 about 1 year ago

Reverted by changeset/158792274

157682107 about 1 year ago

I think so, yes.

157682107 about 1 year ago

Based on your question in your PM: The bot has checked the name "Pilal da mata" for the created water well. During the review, the bot decided that the chosen name was rather unusual for this type of map element. So it left a marker here on the changeset.

158688901 about 1 year ago

The user has also been deleted.

158688942 about 1 year ago

The user has also been deleted.

158702345 about 1 year ago

Thank you for your reply.

Which nature reserve do you mean exactly? After a quick check of the map of the Bundesamt für Naturschutz, I couldn't find a protected area for this changeset or the deleted paths.

The following way is an exception and was correctly tagged: way/1133683928/history

Unfortunately, you also removed it.

158702512 about 1 year ago

Thanks for your reply.

Which nature reserve do you mean exactly? After a quick check of the map of the Bundesamt für Naturschutz, I couldn't find a protected area for this changeset or the deleted path.

158562540 about 1 year ago

Ok, some contributors have added buildings, while others have occasionally removed them at a later time.

158542682 about 1 year ago

Hi Filipe Pinheiro, welcome to OSM.

Could you please have a look at the following wiki page for object mapping and naming: osm.wiki/Good_practice#Don't_use_name_tag_to_describe_things

Thanks!

158533273 about 1 year ago

Hi omalabo,
it looks like there are now several administrative boundaries in the OSM data.

Did you check the boundaries against existing OSM data before importing them here? In other words, was the dataset checked for possible redundancies and corrected if necessary?

Thank you.

158526034 about 1 year ago

Same "issue" as mentioned here: changeset/158523576

158524645 about 1 year ago

Same "issue" as mentioned here: changeset/158523576

158523576 about 1 year ago

Which shapefile do you mean exactly? Was the data not collected by yourself or is it a data import?