phidauex's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 158071792 | 7 months ago | Hi, a few months ago I noticed you added some buildings from microsoft building footprints - I'm not sure if you are in the area or not, but many of these houses around Superior were destroyed in a wildfire after the building footprints were made, so many are no longer accurate - either there is no home there anymore, or it was rebuilt but in a different configuration. Could you take a look using the NAIP imagery (most current right now) and confirm which buildings you added are actually present? Thanks - phidauex |
| 149150873 | over 1 year ago | Hi, I reconnected the sidewalk at Old Brompton Road, breaking that connection interrupts routing in the area. Generally speaking with sidewalks, while following the actual line is usually best, you do often need to make connections to other ways to allow logical routing, to show that a bicycle or pedestrian could transition from the sidewalk to the road at that location. |
| 144811496 | about 2 years ago | Hi, can I ask why you are deleting so many driveways and service roads? While a few may not be valid anymore, it looks like many do exist on the ground and should remain mapped.
|
| 144296127 | about 2 years ago | Hi, the landuse tags should only apply where something has actually been built - for some of these areas where there are no houses, we wouldn't tag them as residential yet, even if they are zoned that way. Likewise with some of the commercial and retail landuse areas you just mapped as well - please either remove those tags, or shrink the mapped area down to the actual built portion. I believe there are a few other open comments on your map additions as well, please take a moment to go back and make needed corrections before continuing to edit, or people may start to revert your additions. Thanks, phidauex
|
| 144115741 | about 2 years ago | Hi, this area should be more precisely tagged as a military residential area - the aeroway tags should be just for the actual airport facility itself.
|
| 144104336 | about 2 years ago | Hi, welcome to OSM! I see you are making some changes around Adelanto. Can you tell me a bit more about what is happening in these large areas west of the airport? Currently the tags make it look like a giant factory is being built, and that they have flooded the entire area between El Mirage and Auburn with water, which I doubt is what you are trying to convey. If you are representing proposed new development, then proposed:aeroway=aerodrome would indicate future airport expansion. osm.wiki/Lifecycle_prefix For the sewer and water area, if you are trying to show that the area is for the water department's use, then man_made=water_works would be more accurate, since natural=water indicates that it is full of water. man_made=water_works And in both cases, you can remove the "name" field unless there is an actual sign calling it that. "Name" isn't use for descriptions, but only for proper names. For most features, the tags themselves describe what it is, rather than the text. Let me know if you have any questions, and please make the necessary updates before moving on in the map. Thanks - phidauex |
| 141187362 | over 2 years ago | Thanks for this! I keep having to un-expand East->E (and North/South/West) for letter-streets in CO (mostly SW CO). Are you doing the same for the other combos?
|
| 141124192 | over 2 years ago | Hi, welcome to the map and thanks for your addition. I wanted to let you know that for roads and highways in OpenStreetMap, we don't abbreviate the road suffice (St., Ct., Ln., etc.), because it is easier for an algorithm to abbreviate than to "un-abbreviate". Would you mind popping back in to this update and expanding the road names? Thanks - phidauex
|
| 97199439 | over 2 years ago | Interesting, I'll take a look and play around with it a bit, I'm glad to see that someone is taking an interest in the GNIS feature ID, it always seemed like a potentially useful tag, marred by several overlapping imports in the past. I've avoided deleting it when I come across it, so I'm glad to see them getting some use. Apologies that this earlier task confused things with the multiple IDs issue. |
| 97199439 | over 2 years ago | Yes, it was from this task I created a few years ago: https://maproulette.org/browse/challenges/3428 At the time, there was no consensus on what to do with the GNIS tags, and we had many cases where there were multiple GNIS IDs referring to the same object (I know that isn't supposed to be possible, but we found it was quite common - maybe from imports of different versions/eras of the database?). The decision at the time was to simply leave the GNIS and NHD tags in place, unless it was clear to the mapper which ID was the "current/correct" ID, not always easy to determine. If we have better tools for identifying correct GNIS ids I'd be happy to help with some of the cleanup. |
| 120385924 | almost 3 years ago | Ok, that sounds reasonable. It is a bit of an odd area right now with the main road still under construction. I'll take another look once they finish the N. Powers extension to I-25. |
| 133731631 | almost 3 years ago | And one more tip - last one I promise. You did a good job tracing the new amazon warehouse, but the way to finalize a building sketch is to use the "square" tool to make all the angles 90 or 45 degrees. In the iD editor, select the building, and hit the "Q" key (for sQuare) and it will tighten up all the angles and greatly improve the look of the map. |
| 133732040 | almost 3 years ago | Hi, its me again! Another recommendation here. In OSM, the "name" tag is only for the proper name of the location or object, not the description (see: osm.wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions). So the proper tagging for a retention basin would be "natural=water", "water=basin" and "basin=retention". The OSM Wiki has a lot of good information on tagging conventions, they can be somewhat complex. basin=* Can you please review and update your recent edits? Thanks - phidauex |
| 133731950 | almost 3 years ago | Hi, thanks for joining OSM and improving the map! I noticed you changed some of these service roads to "trunk", which isn't correct for roads like this. Trunk, in OSM terminology, is for roads that connect major population centers or destinations, while service roads are internal roads for businesses. Can you change these roads around the Amazon building back to "service"? Thanks - phidauex |