OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
137111907 over 2 years ago

Gosh darn Vespucci always faking me out!

106236341 over 2 years ago

Hi, the road is Ioli Ranch with an I, please double check and avoid awkward names like Loli. I'm fixing it so there's no action required, just FYI. Thanks for being an OSM contributor!
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/106236341

94332421 over 2 years ago

Hi ramijcr, thank you for your contributions! I see you've changed County Road 317A to be Southwest 44th Way however I see no evidence of this on the ground. County GIS lists these houses as having "County Road 317A" addresses and street-level imagery from 2011 and Feb 2023 show this road signed as "CR 317A." Can you confirm?

52768396 over 2 years ago

Hi Denis! In this changeset you tagged a bunch of houses as being on "Winifred Pool" street, however county data and street level imagery says these houses are on "Winifred Way." Does that sound right to you?

88984294 over 2 years ago

Hi wvayens, there seem to be a number of problems with this change. Firstly you removed 6024 Houdek Ave and merged it with 5970 Scardino Street, which implies that a house was demolished and its address moved 8 houses to the North. This seems really unlikely since satellite imagery clearly shows all brand new houses sitting in place with no gaps. Secondly, it looks like you renamed Marsh Bend Trail as it enters Wildwood city limits to be "CR-501" which doesn't follow OpenStreetMap conventions unless that section of road literally says "CR-501" with no other possible explanations. Usually, highways get a ref tag only and the name is secondary, as the rest of Marsh Bend Trail has remained.

Please reply to this comment so we can discuss. If I don't hear back in a few days I'll assume these were mistakes and undo them. Thanks for being an OSM contributor!
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/88984294

132657232 over 2 years ago

Hiya! Thanks for your awesome work in this area. Do you have any good address sources for the new houses in the Meggison Road / Newell Loop subdivision?

133952464 over 2 years ago

Hi there, is this not a prison building? Commercial seems like an odd choice for what appears to be jail cells.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133952464

133840524 almost 3 years ago

Sure, just that naming industrial landuses doesn't seem like a very high priority or useful thing. It's unlikely to show up anywhere, and there's only one building on the property with a duplicate address to the landuse, and the most visible sign is on the building not the land, so if we mapped like this we'd be practically mapping property lines instead of buildings which isn't how OSM works. (It's just a building surrounded by parking lots, it's not like a campus or strip mall)

126718596 almost 3 years ago

Hi! I was doing a lot of cleanup at the time, if you have better data please feel free to undo my changes. It's very likely that I didn't see an extent and just removed the duplicate, so as long as there's no duplication I'm happy.

132236518 almost 3 years ago

Hi there! Please undo this edit: in openstreetmap we always expand common abbreviations like St for Street, Ave for Avenue, N for North, etc.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132236518

131900815 almost 3 years ago

Thank you for helping keep OSM accurate!
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131900815

131576825 almost 3 years ago

Hi there! Remember to add the housenumber tag for the numeric portion of the address.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131576825

131157648 almost 3 years ago

Hi thanks for your great contributions! FYI there's not a big need to make multipolygon relations for stuff like parking lots unless they're truly oddly shaped. For curbs, medians, grass, and other non-parking-lot stuff you can usually just normally map them inside of the parking lot without much issue, they're still "part of the lot" if they're encircled by places to park. I only bring it up because relations can easily create confusion and difficulty, so using them sparingly is almost always a good idea.

Thanks again!

130928560 almost 3 years ago

Sure, and I guess it's valid (presumably iD told you this is how to tag, so I guess it's not wrong), it just might be clearer if you reverse the way and make it oneway=yes. But I guess it's not required as long as the arrows point the right way.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/130928560

130928560 almost 3 years ago

Hi and thanks for your contributions! I'm guessing you probably didn't intend to tag one-way=-1 on one of these hiking paths node #1127631556 ?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/130928560

130893751 almost 3 years ago

Hi there! We appreciate you wanting to add your business to OSM, however you can't put your business' location as a PO box inside the UPS store: not only would that make every place with PO boxes a nightmare on the map, but also people would show up to the UPS store thinking they can talk to you.

If you've got a home-based or virtual business where customers aren't able to physically visit you then I'm afraid we can't accept your submission: we're Open Street Map, not Open Business Database, and our primary mission is to curate highly accurate information about where places are and how to physically get to them.

Please let me know your thoughts by commenting here; if there's no satisfactory reply within a few days your submission will be removed.

130741209 almost 3 years ago

Oh wow that's crazy! I guess that's the correct tag for that situation then.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/130741209

130741209 almost 3 years ago

Thanks for your contributions and welcome to Willamette Valley OpenStreetMap! Your changes look fine, with the one exception that I bet Dumbeck Ave has 2 lanes, not 1. The case for lanes=1 is single-lane one-way alleys, turning lanes, onramps, etc, but a normal two-way road with one lane in each direction is lanes=2.

Cheers!
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/130741209

130757264 almost 3 years ago

Welcome to Salem and thank you for improving Minto Brown's mapping!
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/130757264

130616702 almost 3 years ago

Heya! It looks like this turning spot doesn't connect at the end. You might connect it up so that a routing program knows you can turn around here. There's also a turning_circle or turning_loop tag as well that can just be used on an ending node.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/130616702