HI, it looks like you merged some ways here along Dyer Street, which messed up the lane count/type tagging,

It's usually a bad idea (and unnecessary) to merge ways unless you are certain that the tags, relation memberships etc are identical, since the ways were usually split for a reason.

You have removed an an awful lot of service=* tags from parking aisles and driveways here and in other changesets recently. What are you trying to do? I don't understand, it seems counterproductive.

(A couple of turn restrictions also got somewhat messed up here when ways were merged that probably should not have been)

I'm curious what your source for this name is. I can't find any reliable references to it.

This was changed back to a 2-way street about 3 months ago.

It looks like these ways were intentionally split because the Bay Area Ridge Trail passes through a small segment here; merging them made the entire street part of the relation for the trail.

Please don't remove the service=* tags from parking aisles and driveways.

That's referring to the main (often 2 or more lane) roads that you would typically find between individual parking lots in places like shopping centers or airports that have large complex parking arrangements. It is not really relevant to small driveways in a city.

If it was really a junkyard than it probably shouldn't be mapped as a service way at all, I would think, since there wouldn't actually be a "way".

Bing is several years old around here. If you look at one of the more recent layers (the Mapbox and DigitalGlobe layers tend to be the most recent in the Bay Area) it looks like a paved industrial lot with some parking spaces marked along the side.

This change doesn't seem quite correct. The intersection is so wide that vehicles turning right from Posen onto Ordway never actually enter the roundabout - the ways were connected at the same node intentionally to reflect that fact. The sidewalk tags also got (very slightly) messed up here.

This could reasonably be considered either a driveway or a parking aisle, but it's certainly one of them. The service=driveway tag should not have been removed.

If you're going to map random small residential driveways, it would be helpful to add the service=driveway (and usually access=private) tags so that they don't look like publicly-accessible full-size service roads and completely clutter up the map.

Hi, it looks like a bunch of lane tagging got messed up here (lane counts, turn lanes). It's generally a bad idea to merge road segments that have been split without checking to be absolutely sure that they are identical. In this case they had been split where the lane tags changed, and had different tags, which got scrambled in this changeset. Can you fix/revert this?

Please don't delete the service=* tags from service ways.

Please don't delete the service=parking_aisle and service=driveway tags from parking aisles and driveways.

Since the street is only temporarily closed for construction you could have changed it to highway=construction instead of deleting it outright.

Please don't delete random pieces of streets for no reason. Thank you.

Both of these were already on the map.

Please don't remove the service=parking_aisle tag from parking aisles.

This is obviously not a 1-story building - see https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/jje8RFHY_DogqyaWrwTWjA

Why did you add oneway=yes to part of Sansome St (which as far as I can tell was already tagged correctly as only being one-way for private vehicles, for only part of the day)?

Also, fyi, these recent changesets are massive (you edited at least 100 bus route relations here...) and "bus routes" is not always a very useful description when you're also making all kinds of different changes all over the city.