Please don't remove the service=parking_aisle tag from parking aisles.

All of the AC Transit stops on the northeast side of Shattuck/Center have been closed and the buses have been moved back to the stop on the southeast corner. I'm assuming it's related to the impending construction there, but I'm not sure. I couldn't find anything on the website and the text on the temp sign/bag is too tiny to read.

I think you're right that the two 55551 stops are actually the same. I didn't combine them because I didn't want to mess with tons of bus route relations. I moved the (closed) 65 stop back under the tree because that's where the actual sign is.

(this is in relation to these changesets in general rather than this specific one)

I've noticed a few places where things didn't go quite right, mostly minor things like a few stops getting moved slightly to less accurate/old locations which usually doesn't matter much. I came across a few instances where unrelated bus stops near intersections got conflated; there are probably other examples. Are you manually checking these before uploading?

-Here you grabbed a (former?) stop on eastbound University and moved it over to San Pablo (but kept it in the 51B relation):
node/739456122

-This stop got moved from Hopkins over to an unrelated spot in front of the library where AC Transit hasn't stopped for more than a year and a half:
node/650083362
(in reality both stops were combined into node/427886447 )

-On Sacramento St at Ohlone Park the northbound 52 stop was moved across the street and turned into a southbound schoolbus stop: node/2172281494/

-Here ( node/2062592932 ) a (probably closed) stop on Telegraph was moved over to Durant and given the tags that should have gone with node/402254833 , which in reality has been moved to the far side of the intersection.

Hi, you connected the walkways on the roof of the terminal, several stories in the air, with the bus bays underneath the terminal at ground level. If only it were that easy... I have reverted this changeset

Hmm. It's a very narrow, straight street with no sidewalks, that can't be more than 15 feet wide at the widest point. It looks like an alley to me. I would expect a link road to look more like an offramp or slip lane. There are plenty of public streets classified as alleys. (It also looks like it might technically be part of Embarcadero, not Fallon, based on the assessor's map at http://www.acgov.org/ms/prop/maps/BK018/0180435.00.PDF )

I would agree that the rest of Fallon shouldn't be tagged as highway=residential, but tertiary seems excessive to me. It's only a couple of blocks long and almost a dead-end street. It's not a through-route to anywhere and doesn't have much traffic. I would tag it as unclassified myself.

Hey, did you see that the church was already on the map? (way/208161491 ) There's no need to add it twice.

Hi. Is there some reason you deleted these turn restrictions:
relation/6516712/history
relation/6516714/history
relation/6189615/history
?

Two of them were broken when Sansome Street was modified in another edit, but as far as I can tell (without actually walking around the Financial District) they still exist.

Hi. I can assure you that Broadway is still named "Broadway". I have reverted this changeset. You might want to look through your other changesets to see if you accidentally changed any other names.

Hey, you deleted almost 1600 highway=service tags in just this one changeset. I don't have the time or energy to check every one, but almost all of the ones I looked at seem like perfectly valid parking aisles which should not have been changed. Can you fix this please?.

Are you sure about this? I see a street clearly marked for two-way traffic here: https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/YcpCUJwq7F1hWKiamSUKsg

Here also you removed all the tags from the last blocks of Martin Luther King Jr Way and Embarcadero West, and removed service=parking aisle and other valid tags from parking aisles.

Hi, I see you added a bunch of missing service roads/parking aisles. Good. However, you also removed a bunch of valid-looking service=parking_aisle, service=driveway, and surface tags here. Why? Please be careful not to remove valid info. Thanks.

Hi, it looks like you accidentally removed all the tags from Rudsdale Street and turned it into an unnamed service road here. I've fixed it.

Hey, it looks like something got messed up here. There is a duplicated set of Oakland roads (Broadway, 11th, Park, etc) that got added over the top of Alameda.

Looking at this more closely, it looks like the building has both Market Street and 10th Street addresses, so I would remove the 10th Street address from the property. I'm guessing that the missing Market St address should go to the (empty?) storefronts along Market.

In San Francisco addresses are assigned to the property, not the building/door (and most addresses are actually a range of numbers). This is technically all one building that has been sort of messily mapped, so moving the address from some random building part to the property still seems like an improvement to me, at least until the building outline can be cleaned up.

Are you sure about this? The plans for the north side of the station only include fairly minor changes to the parking lots once construction is complete (mostly different paving and a modified bus area), and the north entrance has definitely not been removed.

Also, what's "Bart Way"?

Hi, I'm curious where you got those street names from (Bart Way, W Bart Way, E Bart Way, Busway). I can't find any reference to them anywhere.

Hi, it looks like you mixed up some footways on different levels here. It might help to add layer=1 and level=[whatever level the footway is on] tags to the upper-floor walkways so it's clearer what is going on, and don't connect walkways at different levels that don't actually connect in reality.

Hi, this seems to be an actual place and not a personal poi (if you look at the history it was imported 10 years ago from the GNIS). I have restored it and converted it to a residential polygon around the condo complex