OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
57261051 over 7 years ago

Hey, you deleted almost 1600 highway=service tags in just this one changeset. I don't have the time or energy to check every one, but almost all of the ones I looked at seem like perfectly valid parking aisles which should not have been changed. Can you fix this please?.

56892385 almost 8 years ago

Are you sure about this? I see a street clearly marked for two-way traffic here: https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/YcpCUJwq7F1hWKiamSUKsg

56828815 almost 8 years ago

Here also you removed all the tags from the last blocks of Martin Luther King Jr Way and Embarcadero West, and removed service=parking aisle and other valid tags from parking aisles.

56831366 almost 8 years ago

Hi, I see you added a bunch of missing service roads/parking aisles. Good. However, you also removed a bunch of valid-looking service=parking_aisle, service=driveway, and surface tags here. Why? Please be careful not to remove valid info. Thanks.

56834317 almost 8 years ago

Hi, it looks like you accidentally removed all the tags from Rudsdale Street and turned it into an unnamed service road here. I've fixed it.

55840340 almost 8 years ago

Hey, it looks like something got messed up here. There is a duplicated set of Oakland roads (Broadway, 11th, Park, etc) that got added over the top of Alameda.

55821642 almost 8 years ago

Looking at this more closely, it looks like the building has both Market Street and 10th Street addresses, so I would remove the 10th Street address from the property. I'm guessing that the missing Market St address should go to the (empty?) storefronts along Market.

55821642 almost 8 years ago

In San Francisco addresses are assigned to the property, not the building/door (and most addresses are actually a range of numbers). This is technically all one building that has been sort of messily mapped, so moving the address from some random building part to the property still seems like an improvement to me, at least until the building outline can be cleaned up.

55789807 almost 8 years ago

Are you sure about this? The plans for the north side of the station only include fairly minor changes to the parking lots once construction is complete (mostly different paving and a modified bus area), and the north entrance has definitely not been removed.

Also, what's "Bart Way"?

55790003 almost 8 years ago

Hi, I'm curious where you got those street names from (Bart Way, W Bart Way, E Bart Way, Busway). I can't find any reference to them anywhere.

55740645 almost 8 years ago

Hi, it looks like you mixed up some footways on different levels here. It might help to add layer=1 and level=[whatever level the footway is on] tags to the upper-floor walkways so it's clearer what is going on, and don't connect walkways at different levels that don't actually connect in reality.

55184512 almost 8 years ago

Hi, this seems to be an actual place and not a personal poi (if you look at the history it was imported 10 years ago from the GNIS). I have restored it and converted it to a residential polygon around the condo complex

54505839 about 8 years ago

You deleted the plaza itself, and added a less-detailed park area. The park was fine (it is technically a park), but the park and the pedestrian area represent different things. One represents the administration/landuse (park), while the other is the physical surface (pedestrian area), and can be used by pedestrian/bicycle/transit routing engines.

The reason for the multipolygon is mainly so that the pagoda doesn't get hidden behind the pedestrian area. There are also steps/benches around/under it, so it's not really contiguous with the plaza anyway.

37813100 over 8 years ago

The highway=street_sign tag is there because it functions (both historically and currently) as a street sign. Looking at taginfo highway=street_sign is the most common tag for such features (even though it is undocumented).

37813100 over 8 years ago

It's not a typo. This is a pair of monumental stone street signs (the kind that have the name of the street on them, not a traffic sign) that were built as a formal gateway to the small subdivision on the east side of College Ave. These kind of stone-column street signs are fairly common on the west coast in areas built around the 1900's-1930's but there isn't really a good tag for them currently, and most are still unmapped.

48412244 over 8 years ago

Why do you keep vandalizing the map like this? Most people would have gotten bored by now.

Stop messing things up for everyone else. Please.

48077958 over 8 years ago

There was already an existing relation for the Bay Trail. ( relation/325779/ ) I've merged these members into that one.

48051133 over 8 years ago

It looks like you've set the default name (name)=* of this restaurant to "Greenburger's", and the English name (name:en)=* to "Nara". This doesn't make much sense.

If the name of the restaurant changed you usually only need to change the name=* tag. The name:en=* tag is really only necessary if it has a name in English which is different from the default, and changing it doesn't change the default name.

47959323 over 8 years ago

please stop

47829684 over 8 years ago

Hey, you deleted the buildings here along with the shops; please don't do that unless the buildings have actually been demolished. You only need to remove the tags that actually apply to the closed businesses (in this case shop=* and name=*) I have undeleted the buildings.