OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
63624372 about 7 years ago

This change doesn't seem quite correct. The intersection is so wide that vehicles turning right from Posen onto Ordway never actually enter the roundabout - the ways were connected at the same node intentionally to reflect that fact. The sidewalk tags also got (very slightly) messed up here.

63533550 about 7 years ago

This could reasonably be considered either a driveway or a parking aisle, but it's certainly one of them. The service=driveway tag should not have been removed.

63376690 about 7 years ago

If you're going to map random small residential driveways, it would be helpful to add the service=driveway (and usually access=private) tags so that they don't look like publicly-accessible full-size service roads and completely clutter up the map.

62962906 about 7 years ago

Hi, it looks like a bunch of lane tagging got messed up here (lane counts, turn lanes). It's generally a bad idea to merge road segments that have been split without checking to be absolutely sure that they are identical. In this case they had been split where the lane tags changed, and had different tags, which got scrambled in this changeset. Can you fix/revert this?

62921828 about 7 years ago

Please don't delete the service=* tags from service ways.

62918321 about 7 years ago

Please don't delete the service=parking_aisle and service=driveway tags from parking aisles and driveways.

62868509 about 7 years ago

Since the street is only temporarily closed for construction you could have changed it to highway=construction instead of deleting it outright.

62685825 over 7 years ago

Please don't delete random pieces of streets for no reason. Thank you.

62649531 over 7 years ago

Both of these were already on the map.

62449264 over 7 years ago

Please don't remove the service=parking_aisle tag from parking aisles.

62262103 over 7 years ago

This is obviously not a 1-story building - see https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/jje8RFHY_DogqyaWrwTWjA

61968343 over 7 years ago

Why did you add oneway=yes to part of Sansome St (which as far as I can tell was already tagged correctly as only being one-way for private vehicles, for only part of the day)?

Also, fyi, these recent changesets are massive (you edited at least 100 bus route relations here...) and "bus routes" is not always a very useful description when you're also making all kinds of different changes all over the city.

61923940 over 7 years ago

Please don't remove the service=parking_aisle tag from parking aisles.

61767978 over 7 years ago

All of the AC Transit stops on the northeast side of Shattuck/Center have been closed and the buses have been moved back to the stop on the southeast corner. I'm assuming it's related to the impending construction there, but I'm not sure. I couldn't find anything on the website and the text on the temp sign/bag is too tiny to read.

I think you're right that the two 55551 stops are actually the same. I didn't combine them because I didn't want to mess with tons of bus route relations. I moved the (closed) 65 stop back under the tree because that's where the actual sign is.

61762539 over 7 years ago

(this is in relation to these changesets in general rather than this specific one)

I've noticed a few places where things didn't go quite right, mostly minor things like a few stops getting moved slightly to less accurate/old locations which usually doesn't matter much. I came across a few instances where unrelated bus stops near intersections got conflated; there are probably other examples. Are you manually checking these before uploading?

-Here you grabbed a (former?) stop on eastbound University and moved it over to San Pablo (but kept it in the 51B relation):
node/739456122

-This stop got moved from Hopkins over to an unrelated spot in front of the library where AC Transit hasn't stopped for more than a year and a half:
node/650083362
(in reality both stops were combined into node/427886447 )

-On Sacramento St at Ohlone Park the northbound 52 stop was moved across the street and turned into a southbound schoolbus stop: node/2172281494/

-Here ( node/2062592932 ) a (probably closed) stop on Telegraph was moved over to Durant and given the tags that should have gone with node/402254833 , which in reality has been moved to the far side of the intersection.

61711926 over 7 years ago

Hi, you connected the walkways on the roof of the terminal, several stories in the air, with the bus bays underneath the terminal at ground level. If only it were that easy... I have reverted this changeset

45395176 over 7 years ago

Hmm. It's a very narrow, straight street with no sidewalks, that can't be more than 15 feet wide at the widest point. It looks like an alley to me. I would expect a link road to look more like an offramp or slip lane. There are plenty of public streets classified as alleys. (It also looks like it might technically be part of Embarcadero, not Fallon, based on the assessor's map at http://www.acgov.org/ms/prop/maps/BK018/0180435.00.PDF )

I would agree that the rest of Fallon shouldn't be tagged as highway=residential, but tertiary seems excessive to me. It's only a couple of blocks long and almost a dead-end street. It's not a through-route to anywhere and doesn't have much traffic. I would tag it as unclassified myself.

59927287 over 7 years ago

Hey, did you see that the church was already on the map? (way/208161491 ) There's no need to add it twice.

59870366 over 7 years ago

Hi. Is there some reason you deleted these turn restrictions:
relation/6516712/history
relation/6516714/history
relation/6189615/history
?

Two of them were broken when Sansome Street was modified in another edit, but as far as I can tell (without actually walking around the Financial District) they still exist.

59719681 over 7 years ago

Hi. I can assure you that Broadway is still named "Broadway". I have reverted this changeset. You might want to look through your other changesets to see if you accidentally changed any other names.