OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
115168641 about 4 years ago

Forgot to add second source. Also used aerial imagery Oakland County MiSAIL 2020: BaseMap_EnterpriseOrthoTC2020BasemapMap

84027287 about 4 years ago

Hello John,
I understand this edit was made long ago, but do you recall why the lake in the NE of this changeset (relation/11521) was removed and replaced with a way that doubles back on itself (way/795459307)?
Also why the bridges in the south were removed (ways 719048332 and 719048336)? From what I can see in aerial imagery they still exist.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84027287

114452743 about 4 years ago

Thanks for the updates jpotas.
changeset/115068490
changeset/115068563

114798481 about 4 years ago

For further clarification, previous discussions on the OSM US slack have had consensus that even a temporary change is considered vandalism. Any temporary change you wish to make for personal download should be done offline and not pushed to the live OSM database. Please let me know if I can assist with offline edits when downloading for TGC-Designer-Tools.

114930208 about 4 years ago

For further clarification, specifically I am referring to way/688251137 (way/688251137) on the 13th hole. There is a guide on the wiki (osm.wiki/File:Golf.png) describing the proper usage of multipolygons for this type of feature.

114452743 about 4 years ago

Hello jpotas,
Does this golf course still exist at the time of editing? From what I can see in aerial imagery the land has been redeveloped as residential.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114452743

114798481 about 4 years ago

Hello jpotas,
Thank you for your contributions to OSM. My assumption for this changeset is that you are making this edit for use with the TGC-Designer-Tools utility for the PGA Tour 2K video games. If so, it is not accepted to intentionally map features that do not exist in the real world for this purpose. It is just like "mapping for the renderer", in this case the renderer is TGC-Designer-Tools utility. osm.wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer
Please refrain from deliberately moving nodes like this in the future.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114798481

114930208 about 4 years ago

Hello jpotas, a fairway with a "cutout" in the middle should be modeled as a multipolygon instead of having a single way approach very close to itself.
osm.wiki/Multipolygon_Examples
- Noah
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114930208

114945362 about 4 years ago

Hello zmdaubs,

This is a minor thing, but fairways should have shared nodes leading up to the green according to this wiki page
osm.wiki/File:Golf.png

An acceptable alternative would be to consider the fringe as part of the fairway and make the fairway a multipolygon with the green as the inner part ofthe relation.

Noah
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114945362

114682637 about 4 years ago

I assume you are discussing TGC-Designer-Tools to create a golf course in PGA Tour 2K. In this case, it is not accepted to intentionally map features that do not exist in the real world for this purpose. It is just like "mapping for the renderer", in this case the renderer is TGC-Designer-Tools utility. osm.wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114682637

114682108 about 4 years ago

Hello fattmat58, would you please keep water features tagged water=* in addition to golf=water_hazard? A feature like this can have both tags at the same time.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114682108

114682637 about 4 years ago

Hello fattmat58, would you please share the reasoning for the cartpath zig-zag of way/1010094190 near the clubhouse? From available aerial imagery I can't identify a winding path.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114682637

113544489 about 4 years ago

Thanks, makes sense!

113544489 about 4 years ago

I had seen another user remove features in the golf course due to construction in 2020. What is the estimated date of the aerial imagery used as a source?

113341069 about 4 years ago

Thanks very much, nice work here.

Noah

113125558 about 4 years ago

Hi tpopchock, welcome and thanks for contributing. I can see you're a new mapper so I'm going to take a look and review some of your changesets.

The "name" tag should be used for primary names of features and for the most part should have a sign labeling them. In the case of golf features, to label a tee, fairway, or green as a member of a hole we more commonly uses the "ref" tag, for instance "ref=1".
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113125558

112952350 about 4 years ago

This is actually SW of 13 Mile and John R

112808368 about 4 years ago

Action taken by DWG osm.org/user_blocks/5398
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112808368

112307790 about 4 years ago

Hello, it looks like the wrong way was selected along Fairgrove Ave for the change to footway. I have reverted that part of the changeset. way/8694877/history
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112307790

112426803 about 4 years ago

Hello David,

Thanks for contributing! One request, please attempt to limit the size of changesets to a smaller region so that it can be more easily reviewed. Here is a reference link osm.wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

- Noah