OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
112925127 about 4 years ago

Hi
I retract my comment.
A'Becketts Creek Shared Path seems to be well named and appears to be a local route.

112925127 about 4 years ago

Hi
Only give things a name if they are sign posted with a name.
osm.wiki/Names

112930385 about 4 years ago

Hi
I reverted this due to Flinders Avenue dragged across Mona Vale Road, St Ives suburb node shifted on to Lancaster Avenue.
I then remapped Lynbara Apartments to the correct shape.

112913231 about 4 years ago

Hi
you have deleted the building that Kia Motors occupied and put a node with your business listed in it's place. Was that a mistake or has it been demolished and another building replaced it?

112863216 about 4 years ago

more specifically...
If the waypoint is a node of the path then just delete the name and description tags and leave the node intact, but if the waypoint is on it’s own separate node, then just delete the node.
Tks

112863216 about 4 years ago

Hi
yes, the waypoints can be deleted by selecting in the editor and then deleting.

112526586 about 4 years ago

Hi
I converted these to natural=tree

112316486 about 4 years ago

no response, reverted until I hear back from the mapper and/or the Gold Coast City Council regarding this. Will remap as a multipolygon separately from existing wooded areas if more info is forthcoming.

112399518 about 4 years ago

no response, retagged individual trees from natural=wood to natural=tree, deleted names

112588577 about 4 years ago

no response, reverted as unable to resolve where office or business premise is and maybe only online business listing.

112863216 about 4 years ago

Yes, waypoints are not normally mapped as you can see the junctions along the path on the map. Normally waypoints are added as needed to any gps traces that we might load on to a gps device.

112863216 about 4 years ago

Hi
are the waypoints sign posted and labelled as such on the walk or are they your private information?

112201627 about 4 years ago

I feel this is a very significant boundary too and would like to see it remain in OSM, though there does not appear to be protect_class that it readily fits into, perhaps use protect_class=7.
The wikipedia link in this case is important.

112526586 about 4 years ago

You need to correct the tagging or it will be reverted.

112600141 about 4 years ago

no response, shifted to probable location, deleted malformed tags, reformatted others.

112600141 about 4 years ago

Hi
You have added you business node to the middle of a road intersection, possibly interfering with road navigation. Can you draw the outline of the building you operate from and put your business node over the part you operate from.

112588577 about 4 years ago

Hi
you have mapped this business between two houses on Cocus Drive. Can you place the node over the building you operate from thanks. Is this only an online listing for the Bundaberg area and you don’t operate from a physical business premise or are you a company office located at one of the residential houses on Cocus Drive?

112526064 about 4 years ago

building=apartments

landuse=residential

112526064 about 4 years ago

Hi
the land boundary that encompassed a construction site probably would be better tagged as landuse=residential if the construction of the apartments is completed.
The building=apartments tag is meant to be an outline of the individual apartment buildings instead of a blanket use for a area containing multiple buildings.
You will likely be able to map the individual buildings by using the more recent Bing imagery.

112526586 about 4 years ago

I think natural=tree is the tag used for individual trees
natural=tree