Matias:

No es coherente que Pato's sea un supermercado. ¿sera un kiosko?

STIOP DESTROYING GOOD DATA!!!!!

HOW DO I HAVE TO SAY IT TO YOU AND YOUR GROUP???

YOUR MAPPING METHOD IS BAD!!!!! ADDING BAD QUALITY DATA AND DESTROYING GOOD DATA!!!!

STOP!!!!

EL NOMBRE DE LA CALLE ES "MIGUELETE" NO "CALLE MIGUELETE"!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

NO. LA CALLE ESTA BIEN . ES "20 DE SETIEMBRE".

YOUR WAY OF MAPING IS DESTROYING LOT OF GOOD DATA!!!!!

STOP DESTROYING DATA!!!!!!

¿En que lugar de su reconocimiento terrestre vio el nombre de esta calle escrito como "21 de Septiembre"?

El nombre real y oficial es "21 de Setiembre" y es el que esta en toda la señalizacion vial!!!

Por favor no lo borres sin revisar.
Ya estaba mapeado bien como subterraneo.
"location=underground"

The old tag is shop=motorcycle_repair
shop=motorcycle repair
"Motorcycle repair shop is a shop where you can get your motorcycles repaired. "

It's not a matter of me feeling free to switch back, of how i map a motorcycle clothes shop, the issue is that you change a existing shop that does not sells bike (shop=motorcycle_repair) for another one that does it (or possibly does it), and there is where the quality of the data get worse. In the first version we are sure that don't sells motorcycles, and in the other not.

You should't change an element unless you are sure you are improving it, which is clearly not the case, as all you know is that the shop repairs motorcycles because its mapped there, but you cannot know if it sells motorcycles unless you made a survey, so switching the tags you add
uncertainty to a data that was previously certain.

And the issue is not only the node in this changeset, as for the changeset descriptions it seems you did the same switching several times.

I agree with your comment, but I disagree with the switching, because the switching you made is not semantically equivalent (the old tag clearly does not sell bikes, and the new one does it) and should not be applied without survey.

If the people who initially created the POI knows that it sells bikes, they it would have maped as shop=motorcycle, not as repair service.

In case the name is Yamaha or other bike brand does not implies that is sells them, maybe is only a authorized official service.

Carlos:

Me parece que estas confundiendo marcadores personales con puntos de interes general y publicos, o capaz que el MAPS:ME no aclara cual es cual.

La casa del abuelo parece ser algo privado tuyp.

Hi ti-lo,
If you are switching this tag without a proper survey, i think that "motorcycle:sales=no" should also be added, because the initial tag shop=motorcycle_repair does only imply repairing service, not selling motorcycles.

Is a weird case. The Route 10 is not continuous. Some parts of the route were planned and named "10" but never builit (at least in 30-40 years). In other parts like Maldonado, the jurisdiction were transfered from MTOP to the local government a lot of years ago, other parts the route was only a gravel road built 30-40 years ago, and now being more environmental friendly, the road was closed to the traffic and the dunes reabsorved the road and does not exist anymore.

Wikipedia article about route 10 has several data which i think is not precise, and some other which is erroneous, and without source.

As i said, mtop gis has also some bad data, e,g, shows Route Interbalnearia, ref="IB" as number "200" which is not real, maybe is an internal code for them, but in the grount the route is "IB"

Hi Davide!

Whats the meaning of tag "idstreetview"?

No hay problema. Te comento que lo mejor es no borrar todo el elemento, sino modificarle los atributos, porque al borrar el elemento es complicado ver la historia de cambios que tuvo.

And even mtop.gub.uy have data in ther GIS that shows different numbers/name, and not what are in the signals on the ground.

Please don't use SIG Mides to add "ref". Mides is good source for some data because they have lots of people surveying in the field, but for the routes the authoritative source is mtop.gub.uy.

Sorry. My fault. I'm used to put the address in nodes at the entrance, and didn't look for the building outline beacuse I was only checking nodes.

About the typo, there is'nt any here. It was in other completly different changeset

Oi Vinicius.

Você adicionou os nós com marcas raras.
Eu também não está claro para mim, se a fonte dos dados (IFES) permite que você adicione-os a OSM.

Hi. The amenity status is "abandoned" (with a typo), but shouldn't the address remains unchanged as a real existing address?

Aclaro que lo que he mapeado hasta ahora le he puesto la misma velocidad a la via que al enforcement, pero es por desconocimiento de la tolerancia que tiene cada enforcement.

Justamente es en lo que quiero hacer foco, eso no es asi en todos los casos. Será raro, pero es asi. La camara "ve todo", pero el "enforcement" (la multa) se aplica a una velocidad distinta (mayor por el margen de tolerancia) a la de la señalizacion vial puesta en la calle.

Entonces, tiene que haber espacio para ambas opciones, si la autoridad competente establece una velocidad máxima para una vía, y luego controla con otro criterio, es algo de la realidad, y que es correcto poder mapear.

El navegador por ejemplo podria pitarte por ir a mas de la velocidad maxima de la via (o a veces tiene el mismo navegador una opcion de tolerancia), y ademas advertirte del control solamente si vas mas pasado de la velocidad a la que realmente se multa.