Hi Andy,

Thanks for reviewing our changeset. We have now modified the geometry based on OS OpenData StreetView and Bing Imagery as a part of Changeset: 122991410. Thanks again for the feedback. Happy to learn from you.

PS: Replying on behalf of unnsyeda as the editor is on a leave.

Best Regards,
mundlk.

Hi voschix,

Thanks for flagging this error. Apologies from our end. Thanks for making the necessary changes and happy to learn from you. We will make sure that these errors shall not repeat.

P.S: Replying on behalf of our editor as the editor is no longer a part of our organization.

Best Regards,
mundlk.

Hey Segubi,
Thank you for reviewing our changeset. Apologies for modifying the road. Our editor might have modified it unknowingly. Please feel free to let us know the changes, we will correct the error made.
Best Regards,
mundlk.
.

PS: Replying on behalf, as our editor is no longer a part of our organization.

Hi Sven,

Thanks for bringing this up to our notice. We have now deleted the road connection as per your feedback and latest modifications in the area. Kindly check the changeset (113956993) for your reference.

Best Regards,
mundlk.

PS: Replying on behalf of our editor, as the editor is no longer a part of our organization.

Hi Phil,
Thanks for bringing this to us. Our editor might have missed checking the landuse feature and added access=private based on the gate visible. Apologies for the genuine miss. We have now added access=customers as it seems the right edit to be done.
Best Regards,
mundlk.

PS: Replying on behalf, as our editor is no longer a part of our organization.

Hello,

Apologies for the delay in response. We have received the feedback about a barrier that is restricting the vehicular access. Addition to that, there is a clear road separation in OS Open data street view. Based on these two sources, we have restricted the vehicular access.

Thanks and Regards,
mundlk.

PS: Responding on behalf, as the editor is no longer a part of our organization.

Hello Andy,
Thanks for looking into our edits. Our editor might have made this edit using the offset feature to align with the ground truth. However, I have now modified the geometry that suits with the most aligned imagery (Bing). Please find the changeset (109442877) with modifications.

PS: Replying on behalf, as the editor (shravyp) is no longer a part of our organization. 

Regards,
mundlk.

Hello,
I have added motor_vehicle=no as per the driver feedback. I have gone through all the discussions regarding the issue. Thanks for the valuable feedback and correcting my changes. Always happy to learn from the community.
Thanks and Regards,
mundlk.

Hi,
Thanks for looking into our edits. I have added the road as I was unsure about the type of entity. I have deleted the segment as per your suggestion (changeset: 104196938). Thanks for your valuable feedback. Always happy to learn from the Community.

Thanks and Regards,
mundlk.

Hi Flo,

Thanks for checking into our edits. I have made the changes based on the feedback provided by our station associate who recently visited that vicinity stating that it is a hiking trail and not accessible by motor car. Hence, I have added motorcar=no as per their local survey. Please let me know if anything else needs to be modified. Always happy to learn from the community.

Thanks and Regards,
mundlk.

Hi Phil,
I have made edits according to your inputs. Please let me know if I need to further edit anything. Thanks for looking into our edits. Always happy to learn from the community. I have made the changes in the following changeset: 103819895.

Thanks and Regards,
mundlk.

Hi Phil,
We have recently received requests from our delivery associates and station associates regarding this road. They confirmed with local residents and mentioned road is only for farm/agricultural purposes. Please refer to this image (https://snipboard.io/sUYABy.jpg) for road condition. We understand OS data street view and utilize it for our edits regularly. In this case we prioritized local feedback over OS data. We respect local community suggestions and contributions, please suggest us the way forward here.

Thanks and Regards,
mundlk.

Hi,
Thanks Trigpoint for sharing your thoughts. Back then multiple of our delivery partners were blocked to travel through this road completely. Hence made the changes considering the local inputs. But I do find your inputs valid as we can see in the following case. Unless we have a clear road closure and opening date information, going forward I will avoid adding construction tags. I will pass on the information to my larger team as well. Thanks again for looking into my miss and helping me learn from my mistakes.

Thanks and Regards,
mundlk.

Hi,
Thanks for your review and comment. We have made the changes based on our delivery partners feedback and the one.network resource (https://snipboard.io/XOcbmB.jpg). By mistake I copied a wrong datasource link into my changeset comment. When the edit was made, there was no clear mention of the closure timelines so I left the road as construction. But, with your inputs we have re-visited the case and it looks like the road construction is complete and it is servicible now. I have made the changes in the following changeset: 103718730

Thanks and Regards,
mundlk.

HI,
Thanks for the explanation. please let me know if anything else needs to be modified as per the latest update. Always happy to learn from the community.

Thanks and Regards,
mundlk.

Hi,
Thanks for checking into our edits and making the necessary corrections. I will take this as a learning from the community and make sure to improve my edit quality. Thanks for the valuable feedback, always happy to learn from you.

Thanks and Regards,
mundlk.

Hi,
Thanks for checking into our edits. Based on our driver feedback and the available sources, https://www.goringparishcouncil.gov.uk/news/upcoming-road-closures/ , I have added the construction tag #90282430 and reverted back #91236690 the edit post the mentioned dead line. I will be updating the same in the note as well. It will be helpful if the local knowledge can improvise our edits. Please let me know if anything else needs to be modified. Always happy to learn from the community.
Thank you,
mundlk.

Hi,
Thanks for checking into our edits. Apologies, it is a honest mistake from our end. I have toggled all the imagery before making the edits, I was confused with the imagery as a part of the road is covered by vegetation. I will make sure to never repeat such mistakes. I have toggled all the imagery before making the edit, I am not sure how osm is auto-populating the "imagery used "column. Please correct me if I am wrong. Thanks for making the necessary corrections. Going forward, I will make sure that my edits are aligning with the latest imagery. Always happy to learn from the community.
Thank you.

Hello,
Thanks for checking into our edits. I have added the construction tag based on the source " https://mobil.hessen.de/pressemitteilungen/start-der-stra%C3%9Fenbauarbeiten-zur-grundhaft-ernerung-der-l3195- between ". Thanks for updating the highway tag as per the latest resources. I request you to point us to the other construction site you have mentioned, so that we can make the appropriate changes and revert it in the next month which helps the routing. Thanks for the valuable information. Always happy to learn from the community.

Thanks,
mundlk.

Hi ACarlotti,
Thanks for your valuable explanation. Please find the changeset(88327428) for suggested modifications. Please accept my apologies. Going forward, I will make sure to consider the attributes of parent segment before adding the roads. Thanks for your quick suggestion. Always happy to learn from the community.

Thanks and Regards,
Mundlk.