mueschel's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 132633278 | almost 3 years ago | Hi,
I see you and your group added many tags like these:
These tags are not common in OSM and not used in any other place.
In addition, please point the leader of this mapping effort to our organized editing guidelines:
|
| 132611968 | almost 3 years ago | Hi,
I see you and your group added many tags like these:
These tags are not common in OSM and not used in any other place.
In addition, please point the leader of this mapping effort to our organized editing guidelines:
|
| 132630883 | almost 3 years ago | Hi,
I see you and your group added many tags like these:
These tags are not common in OSM and not used in any other place.
In addition, please point the leader of this mapping effort to our organized editing guidelines:
|
| 132322048 | almost 3 years ago | Hi,
- everything tagged with just a date and the users name
If there is any actual meaning to this, I'm fully fine with reverting my changes and adding proper tags. |
| 132108977 | almost 3 years ago | Isn't a "all-terrain bicycle" what we usually tag as mtb=*? |
| 132321057 | almost 3 years ago | I suggest to delete these nodes for the moment. Then you can load them again from your file, check all the tags for validity and reupload it. Btw, are these just poles for electric wires or also street lamps? |
| 132181443 | almost 3 years ago | Hi,
|
| 132108977 | almost 3 years ago | Hi,
These tags on a relation don't need to be precise - it's more like a hint for whom this route is intended. The precise access rules will be tagged on the ways. |
| 132331988 | almost 3 years ago | "addr:secteur = Secteur yes" looks like a tagging mistake as well. |
| 132331988 | almost 3 years ago | Hi,
|
| 132394750 | almost 3 years ago | Please check your edits for spelling mistakes. I found all of these: barrierer
|
| 132104436 | almost 3 years ago | Hi,
Additional issues with these POIs:
|
| 132321057 | almost 3 years ago | Hi,
Many of the nodes are inside buildings and all of them have several tags that shouldn't be in OSM, e.g.: Lighting_Condition = Working
|
| 132273354 | almost 3 years ago | Thanks,
|
| 132092678 | almost 3 years ago | Hi,
|
| 132273354 | almost 3 years ago | Hi,
|
| 132152432 | almost 3 years ago | 'old_*' is not a documented key part. There are a few cases of tags containing an 'old_' in them, but these are explicitly defined tags. 'was:' is perfectly fine for any tag that isn't describing the current status of an object any more. |
| 132200093 | almost 3 years ago | I never heard of or have seen an "image" suffix. The use cases are very few. It's much more common to use source:key:mapillary. It's necessary to have 'mapillary' as part of the key, otherwise it's impossible to figure out what the number refers to. You can't use a link to Mapillary, because these already changed several times in the last years. |
| 132267674 | almost 3 years ago | Hi,
I reverted these changes. |
| 132191711 | almost 3 years ago | Please check your edits for misspelled tags. There are no "motor_car" or
|