OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
123485563 about 3 years ago

May I point you to this proposal:
osm.wiki/Proposed_features/ElectricScooters

Your input is very welcome!

128659526 about 3 years ago

Hi,
the tag 'moped_p' was replaced by 'speed_pedelec' a while ago. Could you check your edits for this?

128989368 about 3 years ago

Hi,
the tag 'moped_p' was replaced by 'speed_pedelec' a while ago. Could you check your edits for this?

128222338 about 3 years ago

Hi, there are still 7 objects left. Could you check that?
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1o5B

127938317 about 3 years ago

Hi,
you used 'fuel:tng' here - this is not used in other places. Did you mean 'cng'?

129046805 about 3 years ago

hi,
it looks like something went wrong here - all these buildings have many foreign tags that shouldn't be in OSM. Could you check that?

127936936 about 3 years ago

Hi,
what is a 'ped-crossing-post=yes'?

113005558 about 3 years ago

Hi,
is this bridge built up again? It has highway and ruins:highway tags:
way/117698030

127868918 about 3 years ago

Hi,
is this bridge built up again? It has highway and ruins:highway tags:
way/117698030

128864652 about 3 years ago

Hi,
could you check the destination tags you added in the last day?
The order of the different parts of the key is not the usual one, e.g.
You used 'destination:backward:ref", but it should be "destination:ref:backward".
In generic terms the order is:

destination
[:hgv|:bicycle|...]
[:subkey]
[:lanes][:forward|:backward|:both_ways]
=*

128808623 about 3 years ago

Hi,
ein Proposal für die ganzen payment-Tags ist sicher nicht nötig.

Für eine Überweisung haben wir schon payment:wire_transfer (sepa versteht sich in der EU dabei ja von selbst), daher verstehe ich payment:sepa als Synonym für SEPA-Lastschrift.
Sollte man vielleicht einfach mal in der langen Tabelle ergänzen.

127538594 about 3 years ago

Hi,
please check this area, it has no valid tags:
way/1103914353

and please check the spelling of your sccgis keys. You used all of these:

sccgis:shapeare
sccgis:shapearea
sccgis:shape_area

127361851 about 3 years ago

Right, you missed two letters so it didn't show up in Taginfo's "similar" tab...

"artificial" sounds strange - all roads are artificial in some sense. I'd rather go with the "virtual" tag that is used more often already.

127361851 about 3 years ago

Hi,
what does 'artifial_path' mean, apart from the spelling mistake? This tag isn't used in other places.

127294666 about 3 years ago

Hi,
what does ' designation:wegenlegger = eigen_weg' mean? This tag isn't used in any other place.

127931035 about 3 years ago

Is "?" actually the name of this relation? If not it would be rather pointless to show it as a name in any tool.
And, shouldn't the name of a relation be tagged on a relation and not on individual members?

127931035 about 3 years ago

Hi,
how does removing a name tag break a relation?

Btw, the tag 'Guidepost' is not used in any place and seems to be a mistake.

128288943 about 3 years ago

Some thing went very wrong here. Instead of updating existing objects you uploaded ~ 400 duplicates of objects.

Please make sure you always download data using the built-in functions of JOSM and don't load data from any external sources.

126942053 about 3 years ago

Hi,
you used the tag 'cycleway:both:separated' here - I guess this should be cycleway:both:segregated ?

127153180 about 3 years ago

Hi,
you used a strange key here: "id_arturbmoz,fcm" - reference numbers usually use a tag of the form "ref:XYZ". Could you check & change this?