OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
124205099 over 3 years ago

Taginfo gives us 1500 cases of paving_stones:colour and 1600 cases of surface:colour combined with surface=paving_stones.

Given the facts that it has been proposed for a long time, is in use, and it combines well with all the other paving_stones:* keys ...
I'd say both can be used equally well.

124590111 over 3 years ago

Hi,
I found a couple of areas like this one without any valid tag. Could you check and fix this?
way/1084395937

124205099 over 3 years ago

I'd prefer the option to use 'surface:colour'.
It's best to always use the most general tag possible.
Here, it's the color of the surface. That's different to 'paving_stones:shape' - there you describe the shape of the stones, not of the surface, so you have to use the more specific tag.

124153979 over 3 years ago

Oh, that was just seven years ago :-)

124153979 over 3 years ago

Could you tag it according to the Wiki?
amenity=public_bookcase

124153979 over 3 years ago

Hi,
please check this node, it got two contradicting tags:
node/9915327472

Is this a public_bookcase?

124186659 over 3 years ago

Hi,
could you check this POI? It got a strange 'rof' tag:
node/5104701723

124267308 over 3 years ago

Oh sorry, I didn't notice there are two changesets on the same day. I'll contact the other mapper.

123956799 over 3 years ago

Hi,
you used the tag 'addr:streetr' on this building and another one. Could you check & fix this?

way/304953594

124267308 over 3 years ago

This building and another one got a
"addr:streetr" tag - could you check and fix that?

124659098 over 3 years ago

Hi,
could you check 28 nodes you added recently? They have many foreign tags:
http://overpass-turbo.eu/?Q=%5Bout%3Ajson%5D%3B(https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:node%5B%22INGARITCKR%22%5D%3Bway%5B%22INGARITCKR%22%5D%3B%3E%3Brel%5B%22INGARITCKR%22%5D%3B)%3Bout%20meta%3B&C=56.01916;12.76491;13

124593617 over 3 years ago

Hallo,
bitte schaue mal nach den Wegweisern die du eingetragen hast.
Die korrekte Schreibeweise für die Ziele ist
direction_north, nicht direction:north.

123889143 over 3 years ago

Could it be that you mixed something up? pay vs. park:
ref:easypay = 900063
ref:parkingpark = PLZ 9000 Zone 63

123814367 over 3 years ago

Hi,
could you check this node? I guess you wanted to add a 'ref' there:
node/9897833343

123754353 over 3 years ago

Thanks!
Does this register have an official name? Then we could use the key
ref:XYZ

123806274 over 3 years ago

Hi
could you check this way? It got a 'br' tag:
way/1079760665

124566301 over 3 years ago

Hi,
the tag "generator:solar:tracking" is not used in any other place. The common tag used is "solar:tracking" - used >2000 times already. Could you check that?

124550049 over 3 years ago

Hi,
something went wrong with the changes you uploaded today: All the objects have a huge amount of tags that should not be in OSM.

Please always make sure that you clean up the data before uploading.

124534950 over 3 years ago

Hi,
I just removed a tag added by mistake:

"disused:amenity=restaurant" = "yes"

the correct tag
"disused:amenity" = "restaurant"
is still there.

90374587 over 3 years ago

Hi,
do you have any more information about these paths you added here? It seems they are very coarse and I wasn't able to see them in the aerial images.