Oh dear.... who invented that!?

I suggest to split this node into several, one for each type of waste. Then you can use regular 'opening_hours' keys which are more likely to be understood by any application.

Hi,
these opening hours look very strange. Could you explain why you added them in this way?

Hi,
what is the intended meaning of 'cycle_type'? If this about way quality, we already have several tags for this, e.g. class:bicycle

Hi,
you used 'pending' as prefix here. It seems like you're "just" not sure about the exact route? In that case I would remove these prefixes and just leave a fixme note. Because the power line is there, maybe in a slightly different place.

Please check this node, it has no meaningful tags:
node/9879044123

Hi,
please check this relation, something went wrong with the name tag
relation/14336603

Hi,
it seems something went wrong here.

All the nodes have many foreign tags that don't look like they should be in OSM.

I also can't find the required documentation and sources for this import.

Bitte checke die Tags an diesem Node:
node/9867994985

Hi,
please check this POI, it got a strange 'Zestaw' tag:
node/9461773967

Stimmt, in meiner Software achte ich nicht so sehr auf die Reihenfolge, solange alle Bestandteile da sind akzeptiere ich das.

Auf Taginfo sieht man es aber sofort wenn eine unkonventionelle Reihenfolge irgendwo auftaucht.

Hallo,
bitte schaue nach deinen destination-Tags.
Die Abfolge der einzelnen Teile der Keys ist falsch. Korrekt ist

destination:ref:to:lanes:forward
und entsprechend für alle anderen destination-Tags

Gruß
Jan

Hi,
please don't readd 'opreator' tags. The spelling is wrong. I already corrected them once to the correct 'operator'.

Ich weiß nicht warum du diese Änderung nach zwei Jahren nocheinmal kommentierst. Im Wiki steht eindeutig "Don't use URLs in values".

hi,
you added a 'BETECKNING' tag to several road - could you check that?

Hi,
please don't add the tag 'height_ft'. Just the 'height' tag is enough. Having the height in feet like "height=25' " is perfectly fine!

It's a bit messy and shouldn't be overused (IMO), but it exists and is in use:
osm.wiki/Proposed_features/Date_namespace#Examples

Thanks!
I guess we can change that to the date namespace like this?

old_name:-1966
old_name:1966-1976

Hi,
could you explain what these two tags mean? They are not used in other places:
old_name:first
old_name:wenge

Thanks!

"Spam" and "legitimate business" is not a contradiction. There are many accounts which seem to be created (semi-)automatically, create just one node and contain a dump of whatever they want to show up in search engines without taking care about any proper tagging scheme. I'm sure all these businesses actually exist, but the way some SEO companies "use" OSM is nothing we should support (IMHO).

I agree that this particular node is on the border between bad tagging and spam. If you think it's worth keeping and correcting all the wrong tags - feel free to do so! Had it been just bad addr: or payment: keys, I would have corrected it, but this just seemed to be too much.

Hallo,
was bedeuten denn src_ref und srs_ref?
Twitternamen kommen üblicherweise in contact:twitter