mueschel's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 121061737 | over 3 years ago | Hi,
|
| 120873076 | over 3 years ago | Please check all your recent edits. You added hundreds of 'motor_car' tags. The correct spelling is 'motorcar'. Also: Please use changeset comments to describe what you are doing and make sure your account page follows the Organised Editing Guidelines! |
| 120358725 | over 3 years ago | Thanks for the explanation!
|
| 120358725 | over 3 years ago | Could you check this way? It got a strange 'onewayparking' tag:
|
| 120152164 | over 3 years ago | Hi,
|
| 120593063 | over 3 years ago | Pfad oder Gebüsch?
|
| 120888623 | over 3 years ago | It looks like something went wrong here - all these objects don't have any valid tag.
|
| 120896644 | over 3 years ago | This looks like an import of data from some external source.
There are a couple of foreign tags on all the nodes which shouldn't be there. |
| 120901844 | over 3 years ago | Hi,
The other available tags (vending, sells....) also don't fit properly, I think 'product' still describes it best. |
| 120005480 | over 3 years ago | Hi,
|
| 119900201 | over 3 years ago | Hi,
|
| 119862428 | over 3 years ago | Hi,
|
| 120785403 | over 3 years ago | Feel free to change it to
The reason for my edit was:
|
| 119754276 | over 3 years ago | Hi,
Btw: I don't think it's necessary to prefix waste_bin or picnic_table tags with 'dog_park'. It's already clear that they belong to a dog park if they are used on an object with leisure = dog_park. |
| 120754266 | over 3 years ago | It seems you're importing a huge amount of foreign data to OSM. This is not the way how OSM works. Please stop all these imports and follow the import guidelines: All imports must be documented and discussed before they happen. A pure dump of data (including useless data like file names from your private hard drive) is not acceptable in any case. |
| 119527471 | over 3 years ago | Hi,
Is there a chance that this gets used again? If yes, I'd add start_date and end_date and set the relation to 'disused', if not I suggest to remove the relation altogether. |
| 120552794 | over 3 years ago | There is one entriy from 11 years ago when 'fee' was introduced, plus one comment against separation of keys 6 years later. I wouldn't call that a discussion. Currently, 'fee' is used 98.7% with yes/no and the rest is mostly times. Maybe 0.5% with prices (i.e. 5000 use cases). Compare to 22000 use cases of 'charge'. |
| 120552794 | over 3 years ago | Hi,
The reason of my edit was not that I wanted to change fee to charge, but the use of 4 keys that are not used in any other place and that use an undocumented format: fee:1_hour
|
| 119624348 | over 3 years ago | hi,
|
| 119586343 | over 3 years ago | Hi,
|