OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
119157501 over 3 years ago

Hi,
is there really a traffic sign referring to single tracked vehicles here?
I.e. full grown motorcycles and kick scooters are allowed but cargo tricycles are not?

119045729 over 3 years ago

Hi,
I found this combination of keys on a sign:

destination:ref:colour_bg = white
destination:ref:colour_tx = white

This doesn't seem to make sense - white text on a white background is hard to read.
As you're the only one who uses these tags, could you explain how exactly you use them?

Btw, destination:ref:colour is rare, the much more common order is destination:colour:ref.

I'd also expect a tag like
destination:colour:ref:text
because this would fit more nicely with all the other destination:colour tags already in use:
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=destination%3Acolour

119646813 over 3 years ago

How about
"erected_by" (used 160 times)?
"builder" (used 1200 times)?
"constructor" (used 60 times)?
"surveyor" (not used, but maybe the most precise)?

They are all not perfectly describing the situation, but at least are words that can be found in dictionaries.

119744518 over 3 years ago

You're right, I didn't spot this. I just read the changeset comment and assumed that... Fixed.

119744051 over 3 years ago

1. Yes, we really shouldn't do it in most cases. But if it is tagged to avoid mistakes as is your intention, this is fine.

2. This syntax is used very rarely in OSM, and doesn't seem to be referenced in the Multilingual Names Wiki page.

So, I see two options:
- en-Hans (following the more common OSM scheme)
- zh-t-en (following BCP 47 which is more precise but rarely used)
I'll leave the decision to you.

119744051 over 3 years ago

So this is the English name, transliterated to simplified Han?
As we use the ISO codes for languages and scripts, that would be
reg_name:en-Hans

119322181 over 3 years ago

Hi,
could you check this node, it got a strange 'poel' tag:
node/4006214505

119615087 over 3 years ago

Hi,
what is the meaning of this new tag " pedestrian:crossing=no"?

119391981 over 3 years ago

Hallo,
was sind denn "payment:mobile_zahlungen"? So ein Tag gibt es sonst nirgends.

119435876 over 3 years ago

Hi,
you added the strange key 'unref' here - could you check that?
way/11151730

119430908 over 3 years ago

Hi,
you added a 'name:a' tag here - please check which language this is supposed to be.

119524778 over 3 years ago

Hi,
the keys 'network2' and 'operator2' are not common.
You can put both names into one tag and separate them with a ';', e.g.

network = ATV;Arriva

119558671 over 3 years ago

Hi,
you used the new tag "monumentor" here - what does this mean? It doesn't seem to be an English word.

119114604 over 3 years ago

We actually have a special tag for a type2 cable:

socket:type2_cable = no

socket=*

119014797 over 3 years ago

Ah, it wasn't clear to me that 'separate' refers to different dog sizes.
small_dog=designated seems like a very good idea. If there are two separate areas, I don't see a problem in having two dog_parks - the "outer" one could be a multipolygon to exclude the inner, smaller area.

If the area is not mapped, maybe something like small_dog = separate could be used on the main park.

119014797 over 3 years ago

Hi,
the tag "dog_park:separated" is not used in other places - what does it mean?

119114604 over 3 years ago

Hi,
what is the meaning of the tag "untethered"? wireless charging?

Jan

118897257 almost 4 years ago

Hi,
please check the tags you add - I found ~ 100 ways with a "fixing_osm_roads" tag that shouldn't be there. I removed them, but please check your new uploads for the same mistake.

118685841 almost 4 years ago

Hi
you added a strange tag to two nodes:
"lavel:manufacturer" - what does this mean?

118674380 almost 4 years ago

Hi,
what do these tags mean? They are not used in any other place.
service:bicycle:guiding
service:bicycle:tour