mueschel's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 97466590 | about 5 years ago | Please check the fountain tags you added - there are several with spelling mistakes like 'foutain' or 'fountaine'. |
| 97454064 | about 5 years ago | Hallo,
|
| 97381230 | about 5 years ago | Bitte sei vorsichtig mit dem Verschieben von Objekten anhand der neuen Bing-Bilder.
|
| 97394068 | about 5 years ago | Could you check this way, it got a strange tag "mtb:win".
|
| 97487475 | about 5 years ago | Hi,
|
| 97299397 | about 5 years ago | Hi,
|
| 97357681 | about 5 years ago | Hi,
|
| 97256985 | about 5 years ago | Bitte checke diesen Weg:
|
| 97255398 | about 5 years ago | This edit looks better than the last ones.
|
| 97229332 | about 5 years ago | Hi,
|
| 97204986 | about 5 years ago | Hi,
A relation is always a set of already existing ways - adding additional ways without tags, overlapping with roads and paths, is not the right approach. I'm afraid we have to revert many of the changes you did so far. |
| 97120685 | about 5 years ago | Welcome to OSM!
|
| 97098180 | about 5 years ago | Hi,
|
| 96870130 | about 5 years ago | Hi,
The tag you've chosen doesn't seem exactly right. |
| 96992329 | about 5 years ago | Hi,
|
| 90153842 | about 5 years ago | If these are proposed buildings, they should get an appropriate tag. i.e. proposed:building=yes |
| 96878402 | about 5 years ago | Hi,
I'd recommend to do a revert of the changeset using the appropriate tools. There are also several rivers in this changeset were the import left many small pieces but no continuous way:
|
| 96851346 | about 5 years ago | Hi,
|
| 96809543 | about 5 years ago | Thanks for the explanation! The tag should be
You added this one:
|
| 96878402 | about 5 years ago | Hi,
The best way to proceed is to delete this data again, and then to start from scratch following the import guideline. |