Hi,
could you check this building?
way/301079416
The tag "kolonáda = culvert" looks like a mistake.

Hi,
what does 'petroglyphs = yes' mean? This tag is not used in any other place.
way/879504682

Hi,
please check this area, it got many strange tags:
way/880523323

Hi,
this import went wrong.
- several of the tags are misspelled, e.g. these don't exist anywhere else
health_facility:CD_1=Centre De Sante
health_level=6=Mandima
health_level=8=Lwemba

- The source of the data is missing.

- The link to the import documentation is missing.

- You didn't follow the Import Guideline:
osm.wiki/Import/Guidelines

Hallo,
was heißt denn "width:lane"? Dieses Tag gibt es nicht.
Meinst du cycleway:width ?

Gruß
Jan

Hi,
die Tags 'addr:old:XXX' gibt es bisher nicht, meistens wird 'old_addr:XXX' verwendet. Vielleicht kannst du das hier auch anpassen?

Please check this node, it doesn't have any valid tags:
node/8173334604

As I wrote before:
- Keep existing tags as they are.
- Do not change random POIs across the world according to your personal preferences.
- Discuss any change of an existing tagging scheme on the tagging mailing list.

Btw, these are none-existing tags either:
amenity = public transportion
tourism = car:rental

Please use only those tags that are available in your editor as presets or those that are documented in the Wiki.

The unprefixed tags are so rare, they are hardly "common" nor "established". Most of them didn't even exist before you added them.
The tags with 'service:' are established because there are about one hundred thousand of them.

Please stop this world-wide change of established tags immediately!

This is your personal opinion. Looking at it from another perspective, you destroyed the work of mappers who used the documented tagging on a dozen of POIs across the world.

There are a few 'bicycle:repair', but these are only 2% of 'service:bicycle:repair'.

All these tags were not used two days ago:
bicycle:chaintool
bicycle:cleaning
bicycle:market
bicycle:parking
bicycle:pump
bicycle:retail
bicycle:showroom
bicycle:tools

I recommend to use the keys documented in the Wiki since many years:
shop=bicycle

If you're not comfortable with them, please write a proposal for new tags. I know that the whole scheme for vehicle service is not coherent, but changing to new tags without discussion makes the situation even worse. It's exactly how the mess started: Some people followed the official way of discussion and proposals, and suddenly a single person decided to add completely different presets to the iD editor.

Hi,
the tag 'people mover' doesn't exist. I guess you are looking for conveying=*

Please don't change the established 'service:bicycle:XY' tagging scheme to an up to now unused new 'bicycle:XY'. Not unless there was a proposal and consensus to have it changed.

Hier gibt es ebenfalls keine Geschwindigkeitsbeschränkung.

Hier gibt es keine Geschwindigkeitsbegrenzung, deine Quellen sind veraltet.

Hi,
you added many ways with the tag "aller-retour=yes". What does it mean?
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/10CI

Hi,
it looks like something went wrong here - you added several small vineyards inside an already existing large vineyard.
landuses should not overlap like this and either the small ones or the large one should be removed.

The tag is a very nice marker to detect duplicates of existing objects.
We should try to figure out how this happens in JOSM (it's not the first time, happened to various users)

There are 157000 nodes and 10000 ways duplicated.