If you've written a description of the tag, please provide me with a link. Neither Wiki nor Google are able to find it.

Hi,
please check your edits. You added more than 300 objects with a misspelled 'builging' tag.

You could avoid this kind of discussion by providing proper documentation. A "I use this tag" without any explanation of what it means is rather useless. If not even the Wiki-internal search function is able to find them...

Every key should have a proper description page, including a description of its meaning, purpose and use cases.

I'm sorry to say, they are not. Tags starting with 'sccgis:' are not mentioned in any place in the Wiki.
osm.wiki/w/index.php?title=Special:Search&profile=all&search=sccgis%3A&fulltext=1

I'm not referring to coordinates, but the order of members of the relation. All routes are ordered and there is no other example of a tag like yours in other places.

If you say that the start point could also be in other places, then there is no reason to add tags to this specific node.

If you think that this is important information on a node (that isn't even part of the relation), then please be so kind and bring this to the tagging mailing list and ask for comments.

I don't know mkgmap, but all members of a route relation are ordered. The route starts at the first node of the first way.

Hi,
the key 'route_node' doesn't exist and is not necessary. The start of a route relation is determined by its first member way. There is no need to have a special tag on an unrelated node.

The relative maxweight is strange but fine. I asked about maxspeed:relative

Hi,
you uploaded 6 ways without common tags, could you check that?
http://overpass-turbo.eu/?R&Q=%5Bout%3Ajson%5D%3B%28node%5B%22LARID%22%5D%3Bway%5B%22LARID%22%5D%3B%3E%3Brel%5B%22LARID%22%5D%3B%29%3Bout%20meta%3B

Hi,
the 'monitoring' tags you added here are not used in other places. Could you check them and change to common values?
node/7997466322
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=monitoring%3A

Thanks!

Hi,
I see that you added many images to this node. Please keep in mind that OSM is not a gallery - could you link to the Wikimedia category instead?

Hi,
could you explain the key "maxspeed:relative = yes"? This seems a bit strange.

Thanks!

Hi,
you introduced several new keys here,
multipurpose, commercial, Commercial, comercial

Please consider user the established 'building;use' tag instead:
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/?key=building%3Ause#values

Hi,
please explain the meaning of the keys 'health_level6' and 'health_level8'. These are not used in any other place.
What is the source of this import of nodes? What is the license this data is available under?

Please make sure you follow the import guidelines:
osm.wiki/Import/Guidelines

This import added the same nodes several times.
Please make sure you import every object only once.
Please use only established tags.
There is no source information given - where is the data from and what is its license?
Please follow the import guidelines.

Hi,
please check the tagging of these nodes.

Please explain the meaning of the tag 'waypoints'. This is not used in any other place.

Please also check the names of these trees - the 'name' tag is only for the actual name of an object, but not for a description. The kind of tree is tagged using the 'species' tag.

If this is some kind of group activity, please point your supervisor to the OSM guidelines:
osm.wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

Thanks!

Please check all your recent edits. I found about 100 buildings with a misspelled "building:" tag.

Please check your edits of the past days. You added hundreds of buildings with a 'buildings' tag instead of the correct 'building'.

Please check your edits of the past days. You added hundreds of buildings with a 'buildibg' tag instead of the correct 'building'.

Hi,
please check the tags on these nodes. Many of them are misspelled and not used in any other place.

If this is some kind of group activity, please point your supervisor to the OSM guidelines:
osm.wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

Thanks!