mueschel's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 173529294 | 2 months ago | This is done by an entry in the Wiki. Here's a brief description of how it works:
|
| 173529294 | 2 months ago | Hi,
It would be better to have it in a common 'url' or 'ref' tag, e.g. ref:wikimaginot = 10461 url = https://wikimaginot.eu/V70_construction_detail.php?id=10461 |
| 173533619 | 2 months ago | Hi,
|
| 173359340 | 2 months ago | Hi,
|
| 173102217 | 2 months ago | I don't think we already have a tag for this.
It could be "landuse=recycling" - focusing on how this area is used. It could be "man_made=recycling_place" - a structure (platform, marked area) for recycling There could also be a new value for "recycling_type" - currently we only have "container" and "centre" |
| 173453061 | 2 months ago | "street:old_name" is not a tag that is in use anywhere. Adding an "old_" in the middle of any tag is very unlikely to be supported by any tool. It is the name of a street that no longer exists (in the place this highway is located). The proper tag, if you want to keep the "street:name" intact would be "was:street:name". As the street itself doesn't exist anymore and the footway is the sole thing remaining, "old_name" seems perfectly valid to use in this case. |
| 173301381 | 2 months ago | Hi,
|
| 173263336 | 2 months ago | Hi,
|
| 173094249 | 2 months ago | I reverted these changes for now. Please feel free to import them again with proper tags, and following our Import Guidelines. |
| 172915075 | 2 months ago | I reverted this changeset: It contains only 1000 nodes without any tag |
| 173210827 | 2 months ago | Something went wrong with this import. All the objects don't have any valid tag. The mandatory link to the documentation of the import is missing.
|
| 173102217 | 2 months ago | You want to tag the area that contains all the containers and (depending on design) might have a different paving style or some kind of small wall around it? |
| 173158778 | 2 months ago | Hi,
|
| 173116358 | 2 months ago | Wer denkt sich sowas aus für eine öffentliche Ladestation? Diese Stecker passen in eine Menge Geräte die bei 36 Volt einfach in Rauch aufgehen würden... Einen gängigen Namen kann ich nicht finden. Die beiden kleinen stammen aus IEC 60130-10, aber haben dort auch keine Bezeichnung. |
| 173048475 | 2 months ago | 'name:kmal' didn't exist until a few days ago and 'ref:kmal' was used a lot less than 'ref:KMAL'. |
| 173102217 | 2 months ago | Could you check this object, it got a strange recycling tag:
|
| 173116358 | 2 months ago | Zweite Frage: Was ist "socket:rosenberger"? |
| 173048475 | 2 months ago | Why this change? Using capital letters in 'ref' and 'name' for the name of the operator is very common. For 2/3 letter abbreviations it also prevents conflicts with language codes in name tags. |
| 173132663 | 2 months ago | I didn't add this tag. |
| 173116358 | 2 months ago | Hallo,
Das Problem ist, dass die Belegung von solchen Rundstecker nicht genormt ist, weder die Spannung noch die Polarität. Wenn die hier öffentlich zugänglich sind, muss irgendein Standard dahinter stecken. |