Hallo,
ich verstehe die Tags hier nicht.

way/23729600

note passt nicht zu traffic_sign und beide passen nicht zu oneway:bicycle.

Was genau ist dort auf welchem Abschnitt beschildert?

Hi,
please check the buildings - they all have a strange "loc_rec" tag that looks like a mistake.

Hi,
please check the imported trees. They have some strange tags that look like they shouldn't be in OSM, e.g.:

object_cit = Medellin
relation_s = Volador

Hi,
please check the imported trees. They have some strange tags that look like they shouldn't be in OSM, e.g.:

object_cit = Medellin
relation_s = Volador

Hi,
could you check this stream? It has a name and an ELVIS tag, but they don't match:
way/1337242856

Hi,
schau bitte mal nach diesem Wegweiser, der hat ein "abs" Tag anstelle eines direction_*

node/12349578553

Could you please check this import? All these ways seem to already exist as boundaries of the National Forest - but yours are shifted by some dozen meters.Are you sure the boundaries for the Forest and River areas are not identical?

Hi,
could you check this area, it's missing its tags.
way/1334487629

Hi,
you're using the tag "step_contrast" here. The documented spelling of this tag is "step:contrast":
osm.wiki/Key%3Astep%3Acontrast

Could you change that?

Hi,
please check this farm, something went wrong with the name tag:
way/1332468902

That's what I did: move it to contact:facebook. But I used the short version with just the user name and not the full URL.

Ich meine alle 64 Wege die in diesem Changeset hochgeladen worden sind.

Hi,
this relation got some strange tags like
wh
ph
otype
kkp sdesc

Where these added by mistake?

Hallo,
hier ist etwas schiefgegangen. All diese Wege haben ausschließlich fremde Tags die nicht in OSM sein sollten. Können diese Wege einfach wieder gelöscht werden?

Hi,
you introduced the new tag
ref:AU.gov.vic.colac-otway.bridgeno

This scheme doesn't match the others for such reference numbers.
Currently in use are these:
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=ref%3AAU-#keys

Maybe this is the better one?
ref:AU-VIC.colac-otway.bridge

Dagegen spricht die Einheitlichkeit von Tags. Als ich das vor eineinhalb Jahren editiert habe, gab es skatepark=* noch überhaupt nicht, nur ein paar Dutzend skatepark:*=yes.

Die Form mit Doppelpunkt entspricht auch dem 2019 geschriebenen Proposal für Skateparks.

Hi,
these new boundaries don't align with the already existing ones. The old ones seem to be more accurate and align with natural features like the Niger river and city boundaries.

It seems that there is no response from Matthew. If there are no objections, I'll try to do a revert tomorrow.

I can't do cherry picking the correct and incorrect edits one by one if you overwrite them once a week on dozens of objects.

Sorting this issue out manually is up to you.

The phone number is fine as it is. But there are plenty other contact tags that you keep changing. Just check the history of any of the nodes:
node/10943688612/history