OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
114943512 about 4 years ago

Hallo,
was heißt denn "payment:ad-hoc"? Dieses Tag gibt es sonst nirgends.

114896753 about 4 years ago

If these are regular levels, you can add them to "building:levels" - this is always the actual size of the building. If you want to keep track of the previous state, you can use a tag like "was:building:levels".

114896753 about 4 years ago

Hi,
"additional levels" is an uncommon key. Could you explain what it means? Maybe levels under the roof?

Thanks!
Jan

114876239 about 4 years ago

Hi,
you used the tag "reverse:conditional" here - this is not used anywhere else. What does it mean?

114901172 about 4 years ago

Hi,
please have a look at the areas you added here - some got a strange tag like "SCRUB=PHASE 3"

114900082 about 4 years ago

There are some more: http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1ebB

114900082 about 4 years ago

Thanks for taking care, but there are still objects with this tag.

114938792 about 4 years ago

Hi,
it looks like something went wrong here, there are many areas with impossible geometry like this one:
way/1012210581

114917923 about 4 years ago

Hi,
please have a look at these intersections. It's "traffic_signals", not "traffic_signal" - in both the key and value.

114899527 about 4 years ago

Hallo,
das 'destination' Tag hat seine eigene Art verschiedene Sprachen anzugeben. Nicht "destination:XX", sondern "destination:lang:XX". Kannst du das korrigieren? Das zusätzliche "lang:" ist nötig um keine Verwechslungen zu erzeugen, z.B. bei "destination:to".

Grüße
Jan

114922219 about 4 years ago

Hi,
this looks like an import of POIs from another database. Please clarify the source of the data, and whether it is compatible with ODbL.
See
osm.wiki/Import/Guidelines

114892409 about 4 years ago

Hi,
please check the areas you added here, some have only foreign tags and no proper OSM tags, like this one:
way/1011835173

114830660 about 4 years ago

Hi,
it's not necessary to invent a new 'url:hjdsafhdskl' tag for every different website. It's perfectly fine to just use 'url' for these.

114900082 about 4 years ago

Please check the spelling of your tags. E.g. "impicit".

114834695 about 4 years ago

"ccs", nicht "css". ;-)

114828826 about 4 years ago

Hi,
these waterways got a strange tag "gpx:name". Could you check this and either convert it to a proper 'name' tag or remove it?

114846605 about 4 years ago

Hi,
could you check the nodes that were added here? 85 of them have only strange tags but no common OSM tags, like this one:
node/9332012602

Thanks!

114834695 about 4 years ago

Bitte schau hier mal nach den Socket-Typen. Einen "socket:tesla_supercharger_css" gibt es nicht.

114859495 about 4 years ago

Hi,
you used the prefix "addr:" on these objects - this is usually only used for postal addresses of buildings. Could these be changed to 'ref:'? At least it seems to me that these are reference numbers.

Cheers
Jan

114823090 about 4 years ago

Hi,
something went wrong here. You added hundreds of objects with strange tags, partially duplicates of existing buildings.

Did you check the license of this data for compatibility with OSM?
Did you follow the OSM Import Guidelines?
osm.wiki/Import/Guidelines