OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
97466590 about 5 years ago

Please check the fountain tags you added - there are several with spelling mistakes like 'foutain' or 'fountaine'.

97454064 about 5 years ago

Hallo,
bitte checke dieses Gebiet, das hat keine richtigen Tags bekommen:
way/894990820

97381230 about 5 years ago

Bitte sei vorsichtig mit dem Verschieben von Objekten anhand der neuen Bing-Bilder.
In den meisten Regionen ist die Lagegenauigkeit wesentlich schlechter als die von anderen Quellen, z.B. Maxar.

97394068 about 5 years ago

Could you check this way, it got a strange tag "mtb:win".
way/101811681

97487475 about 5 years ago

Hi,
welcome to OSM!
In OSM we have to use a well-defined set of tags to allow all the software tools to understand the data and e.g. show it on maps.
Please use only keys that are documented in the Wiki or are available as presets in your editor.
Thanks!

97299397 about 5 years ago

Hi,
you added the new tag 'dedicatee' here, shouldn't that be 'subject'?

97357681 about 5 years ago

Hi,
please explain the new tagging scheme you're using in your world-wide edits.
Do you know of the usual way how to introduce new tags by writing a proposal and asking for comments from other mappers?

97256985 about 5 years ago

Bitte checke diesen Weg:
way/28218972
Da hat es den Tag taxi=yes=no

97255398 about 5 years ago

This edit looks better than the last ones.
However:
- ways must be connected to each other to be usable in routing.
- please don't ignore warnings and errors from the validator. Fix them before uploading your changes.
- "486 Rascino-Monte Nuria" is not the name of any of the tracks on the map. It's the name of the relation - and it should only appear there, but not on the ways.

97229332 about 5 years ago

Hi,
could you check this building? I guess something went wrong with the name tag:
way/893794736

97204986 about 5 years ago

Hi,
welcome to OSM.
Please spend a bit of time to understand how relations work in OSM. The best is to look at existing hiking trails.

A relation is always a set of already existing ways - adding additional ways without tags, overlapping with roads and paths, is not the right approach.

I'm afraid we have to revert many of the changes you did so far.

97120685 about 5 years ago

Welcome to OSM!
you used many tags here that are not in use in any other place. Please use only tags that are described in the OSM Wiki or are available in the presets of your editor.
This is necessary to make sure that every other user can understand the data.

97098180 about 5 years ago

Hi,
please check the tags you added recently. It's 'wikipedia', not 'wikipadia'.

96870130 about 5 years ago

Hi,
welcome to OSM!
Could you explain what this object is?
way/891741435

The tag you've chosen doesn't seem exactly right.

96992329 about 5 years ago

Hi,
please check the relation you added here - it has many strange tags:
relation/12138090

90153842 about 5 years ago

If these are proposed buildings, they should get an appropriate tag. i.e. proposed:building=yes

96878402 about 5 years ago

Hi,
please be careful if you use the editing method mentioned by adiatmad - if you don't take a lot of care you might end up with corrupted data and a huge number of conflicts during upload.

I'd recommend to do a revert of the changeset using the appropriate tools.

There are also several rivers in this changeset were the import left many small pieces but no continuous way:
way/891776300#map=17/-7.68542/112.42225

96851346 about 5 years ago

Hi,
please check this node, it got a strange tag:
node/2851381005

96809543 about 5 years ago

Thanks for the explanation!

The tag should be
disused:leisure = park

You added this one:
disused:leisure=park = City view point

96878402 about 5 years ago

Hi,
thanks for the reply!
OSM has some rules with respect to imports of foreign data.
Please have a look at them:
osm.wiki/Import/Guidelines

The best way to proceed is to delete this data again, and then to start from scratch following the import guideline.