Hi,
"ref:crfop" is a new key. There is already "ref:CRFOP" in use, but the format of numbers is the same as for 'ref:inspire'.
Could you check that?

Hi,
you used tags like "ref:EU:ENTSOE_EIC_11" here. The by far most common way to number tags is with a colon instead of an underscore, e.g. "ref:EU:ENTSOE_EIC:11". Could you change that?

Given the sheer amount of numbers, maybe it's better to create a wikidata entry for these solar parks and have the numbers there?

Hi,
what does "maxweightrating:total" mean? This tag isn't used in any other place.

Hi,
"psv_bypass" seems a bit strange. 'psv' also includes small vehicles, i.e. there would be a bypass for every vehicle. There are already two 'hgv_bypass' in OSM which might be better suited.

Or you could add a generic vehicle-type subtag:
traffic_calming:bus = no

Hi,
this object got a strange 'uprns' tag, could you check that?
way/1117841954#map=19/51.522379/0.021360

Hi,
please check your tags: It's "operator", not "opeator". I already fixed a few dozen yesterday, but there are more.

Hi,
could you check this building? Something went wrong with the irish name tag.

Hi,
please don't misuse OSM tags to add dozens of keywords to businesses. 50 'service' tags with different versions of the same term is not reasonable.
Please make sure that you stick to the tags offered by the editor, and only add own ones if absolutely necessary.

Hi,
you imported a large amount of data here. What is the source of the data? Is it available under a license compatible with OSM? Where can we find the mandatory documentation of the import?

Please read our import guidelines:
osm.wiki/Import/Guidelines

Hi,
please check your tags. There are no keys like "vending4" in other places. Please check the wiki for the correct tags.

Thanks for the explanation! This can be tagged easily:

Does "vehicles" include bicycles?
If yes:
vehicle:conditional= destination @ (Jun 01 - Sep 30)

If no:
motor_vehicle:conditional= destination @ (Jun 01 - Sep 30)

There are no further access tags needed.

Hi,
you added many "FIX_ME = YES" here - can this be changed to something more meaningful, if anything needs to be fixed at all?

Hi,
what do these tags mean?
date_of =09-30
date_on =06-01
If there is temporary closure, the common tagging is using conditional access tags.

Hi,
something went quite wrong here. You imported a set of power towers, mostly with a lot of foreign tags that shouldn't be in OSM.

They have been imported twice, on top of already existing objects. I.e. now we have every tower 3 times in the database.

It seems that this changeset and the duplicate one needs to be reverted.

Hi & welcome to OSM!

You added a huge number of tags here, which are not used in any other place. OSM is a geographic database, but not a place to store lots of side information. It would be much better to have this information on the dedicated platforms, like wikipedia. A single link to wikipedia or wikidata would be sufficient to have all this information in a much more readable and accessible way.

Die seit langem dokumentierte Version ist "position:distance", was wirklich keine gute Namenswahl ist.
position=*

Ich würde aber trotzdem bei diesem etabliertem Tag bleiben, bis etwas neues definiert wird. Ich weiß nicht, aus welchen Gründen hier ein "position:back" im Wiki gelandet ist.

Hast du von dem "hinter dem Schild" ein Foto? Wie ist das auf dem Schild markiert? Ich würde da einen negativen Wert in "position:distance" oder "position:front" erwarten.

Schreib gerne was in der Diskussion. Wenn da noch 1-2 positive Stimmen dazukommen würde ich das im Wiki erfassen (mit Hinweis auf Diskussion und die ältere Version).

Hallo,
'position:back' gibt es bis jetzt nirgends.
Es gab vor kurzem eine Diskussion dazu, mit einigen Stimmen für "position:front" und überwiegend ablehnenden Stimmen zu "position:back".
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/fire-hydrant-plate-position-distance-ambiguity/131963

Hi,
what does 'situacao = Despejada' mean? This tag isn't used in any other place.

Hi,
these charging points deliver up to 400 kW on a single socket, but only 400 kW combined if both are in use?
This tagging is already in use for this:

charge_point:output = 400 kW
socket:type2_combo:output = 400 kW

Thanks!

There is a tag for that:
osm.wiki/Key%3Acash_out%3Anotes%3Adenominations