Hi,
it was added already a bit earlier as "tabletop_games =yes", I changed it to games=tabletop. That usually refers to places that have a shelf with games that you can play while enjoying your drink.

Hi,
could you check these buildings? Many got a strange "fait=ok" tag.

"outdated" gibt es bei jetzt (fast) nirgends. Es hat für mich auch nicht direkt die Bedeutung von "das steht da fälschlicherweise noch dran".

Allerdings haben wir "not:" für Dinge die nicht das sind, nachdem sie aussehen.

Here the standard is AFAIK 11 kg, but I think that's the size also on sales in the places with a "fuel:gas:bottled" tag.

Hi,
you added many
"maxspeed:type:AU = urban" tags.
The 'AU' should be part of the value:

maxspeed:type = AU:urban

Could you change that?

Hi,
the advertising signs you added got several strange tags. Could you check them and change them to common tags?

date_m = 24.04.2025
display_surface = 18
land_property = Администрация города
luminous = no
operator = ?
opor_count = 1
visibility = 100

Hi,
tags like "carriageway:width:min" are not yet in use.
I suggest to use the common :start and :end suffixes for ways that change their width as it seems to be the case here.

Also: Many of the ways are more than one kilometer wide which is clearly a mistake.

Hi,
you added the new tag "gas:cylinder" here. What size of container is that? There are already a few
'fuel:gas:bottled' tags used in other places that might fit here as well.

Hi,
you added 'sibat=yes' to several objects. This tag is not used in any other place - what does it mean?

That's up to the local community to decide. I just changed the uppercase spelling to the common lowercase.

Hi,
please check the power objects you added. Several have strange tags like

Feeder_Cod = NSBT89
Feeder_Nam = SABU P26 - NLYN P336 (89)
Line_Cable = Cable
Operating_ = 33 SBT

Hi,
could you check your edits? There are many objects with strange tags like
"bgt_tags = onbegroeidterreindeel_vlak---open verharding---"

Hi,
you added some new gtfs tags here:
gtfs:stop_id:BREIZHGO_CAR_56

It might be better to prefix them with the region, like most of them:
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/gtfs:stop_id#similar

I.e.
gtfs:stop_id:FR-BRE-BREIZHGO_CAR_56

Das wäre dann ein Taggingfehler der durch ein besseres Tag ersetzt werden muss. Leider ist so eine undokumentierte Doppelnutzung für jeden anderen Mapper unverständlich wenn er es irgendwo findet...

'direction_east' gibt die aufgeführten Ziele an, nicht die Richtung von Markern. "direction_east=yes" wäre ein Wegweiser auf dem wörtlich "yes" steht.

Hi,
you added some new gtfs tags here:
gtfs:stop_id:Alto

It might be better to prefix them with the region, like most of them:
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/gtfs:stop_id#similar

I.e.
gtfs:stop_id:FR-NOR-Alto

I'd say this is a authentication method:

authentication:permit = yes
permit = federal_recreation_pass

Hi,
you and your group

1) added several strange tags to buildings:
construction:date:nb
construction_date.nb
construction_date:nb
building:architecture:
building:architecture:niveau

2) duplicated many addresses that now exist twice

3) the content of "building:architecture" is not according to the documented use of the tag

Please check these issues and please point the leader of this mapping activity to the "organized mapping guidelines" which may apply to this activity:
https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

Hi,
you and your group

1) added several strange tags to buildings:
construction:date:nb
construction_date.nb
construction_date:nb
building:architecture:
building:architecture:niveau

2) duplicated many addresses that now exist twice

3) the content of "building:architecture" is not according to the documented use of the tag

Please check these issues and please point the leader of this mapping activity to the "organized mapping guidelines" which may apply to this activity:
https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

Hi,
you and your group

1) added several strange tags to buildings:
construction:date:nb
construction_date.nb
construction_date:nb
building:architecture:
building:architecture:niveau

2) duplicated many addresses that now exist twice

3) the content of "building:architecture" is not according to the documented use of the tag

Please check these issues and please point the leader of this mapping activity to the "organized mapping guidelines" which may apply to this activity:
https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines