mueschel's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 164538770 | 9 months ago | This link to official sources is already contained in the ref:cadastre tag. The actual url doesn't need to be tagged - it can be generated automatically. And as urls like these tend to change often having only the reference number in the database is very much preferable. |
| 164240249 | 9 months ago | Thanks for the long description!
emergency=no
The keys are all already in use, albeit not in the context of a clinic for epidemics. |
| 164240249 | 9 months ago | Hi,
|
| 164385832 | 9 months ago | Hi,
|
| 164056335 | 9 months ago | Thanks! The best would be to have a picture of the actual pumps. They are required to label them with the actual generic type of fuel. |
| 164142189 | 9 months ago | Could you check this bicycle parking, it got a strange 'ulock' tag.
|
| 164056335 | 9 months ago | The gas station also got several fuel tags that are not used in other places. These are branded names, that should be translated to generic names like fuel:diesel_b7 or fuel:biodiesel |
| 164212458 | 9 months ago | Hi,
|
| 164168674 | 9 months ago | Hi,
|
| 164056335 | 9 months ago | The "Finland Scheme" is long outdated. The wiki page you cite has been written 12 years ago, without updates since. The discussion about traffic_sign:id was very broad. The situation for destination signs is a lot simpler. Any new scheme can be extended throughout the whole of Europe without problems - and the existing scheme is almost capable of it, with just some minor tweaks and extensions. Please write a request for comments in the international tagging section of the forums. |
| 164056335 | 9 months ago | " at the forum thread that we only talk yopaseopor and myself. That's because we are the only two users in the Catalan community" That's part of the problem. Traffic signs are not a local thing, but globally (or at least Europe-wide) very similar. A tagging scheme can't be discussed in a small local group, it needs to involve the whole community. That's what proposals are for. Please don't use changeset comments to explain things, this information can't be found later. |
| 164056335 | 9 months ago | Hi Xavier,
|
| 163968059 | 9 months ago | Tracing and copying are different things, and both might be fine or not. The import process is there to find out about such differences before beginning the import. |
| 163968059 | 9 months ago | If this is an import, you need to follow the OSM Import Guidelines:
On the page you linked I couldn't find a license for this data. Are you sure the data is compatible with the requirements of OSM and ODbL? |
| 164023967 | 9 months ago | Reminder: Please check your tags for spelling mistakes! Things like "wate way", "wateway", "water way" are useless for OSM. |
| 163968059 | 9 months ago | Please check your upload routine. 20,000 "gpx:ele=0.0" tags are useless and should not be uploaded.
|
| 162378258 | 9 months ago | Hi,
|
| 163869948 | 9 months ago | Please stop spamming the OSM database while testing your software. There is a dedicated development API for this purpose. |
| 163877352 | 9 months ago | Hi, welcome to OSM.
248 points sounds like you're copying them from somewhere. What is the source, and is its license compatible with OSM? For importing data, there is a dedicated set of rules:
|
| 163777353 | 9 months ago | Hi,
|