Klingt nach Schuko, aber wer weiß...

Wir haben aber tagging-mäßig vorgesorgt mit "socket:unknown=4" und
"socket:unknown:output=8"

Hi,
schau mal nach dieser Ladestation - die Angabe des Stecker-Typs fehlt:
node/12090042058

Hi,
was ist denn ein "foot_trigger"?

Hi,
it seems there is a mistake in the wiki.
The source tag should be
source:quiet_hours - "source" is almost always used as a prefix.
This is also as mentioned in the text in the Wiki, but the example below shows a wrong tag.
Could you check & edit the POIs?

"small_metal" in addition to the two tags I mentioned ("metal_packaging", "cans") seems to reflect the examples quite well. I think you can just add these three tags instead of the original one.

I suggest to remove the ~ 100 objects that are not tagged correctly for now. Then you can more easily enter them again using the presets available in the editor. That's simpler than trying to edit them in place.

Hi,
these bus stops got three strange tags:

stop_code
stop_desc
stop_url

The first one is a duplicate of 'ref'. Did you really mean to add these tags?

'wheelchair_boarding' is also not an established tag - bus stops are typically tagged with 'wheelchair'.

Yes, I understood that - but the choice of the tag doesn't fit to what OSM uses as definition for 'maxheight'.

Hi,
could you consider another tag instead of "maxheight:fall"? maxheight always refers to a legal height limit, which you tag does not.
Something lime 'hazard:fall:height' might be more appropriate

The tag "emergency" has a different meaning, it's not used to tag an abstract danger of some kind. That would be "hazard". Or, in the case of flooding, the common tag is "flood_prone".

If the buildings just were in danger of being flooded once, but nothing happened, then I'd say that this is nothing that belongs into OSM.

https://github.com/osmberlin/osm-traffic-sign-tool/issues/72

Das sieht nach einem Bug aus. Das Tag "oneway:cycleway" gibt es nämlich nicht. "oneway" oder "oneway:bicycle" wäre korrekt.
An Straßen gäbes dann noch "cycleway:left:oneway" als Möglichkeit.

Hi,
you added "efa:*" tags here. These are not used in other places. Aren't they meant to be "gtfs:*"?

Hi,
could you point us to a discussion of this change? LL-t-LL tags for transliteration are very rare in OSM, while adding -Script to a language is the common way for names in different alphabets.

Please don't dump all your recorded POIs into the OSM database. Edit them one by one, and upload only those that you reviewed and where you added the proper tags.

The larger part of the edit looks quite reasonable to me.

If you disagree, feel free to revert including my changes.

Something went wrong here. Most of these objects don't have valid tags, many are duplicates of existing POIs, all have a foreign 'gpxicon' tag that shouldn't appear in OSM.

Please check this area, it doesn't have any valid tag
way/1359381878

Hi,
bitte schau nochmal über die ganzen Wegweiser-Tags. Bei vielen stimmt die Reihenfolge im Key nicht, z.B.

destination:forward:lanes
-> destination:lanes:forward

destination:backward:lanes:colour
->
destination:colour:lanes:backward

Hi,
could you check this way without valid tags?
way/1359041111#map=16/39.43509/-31.20944