mrpulley's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 147432769 | almost 2 years ago | Mapillary from 2020 had maxspeed 60, but DCS imagery has maxspeed 50 (not sure of date). Previous maxspeed had been added in Dec. 2023. Has this been checked by survey? |
| 117832823 | almost 2 years ago | Could you confirm the source for the maxspeed change? Was it the NSW Speed data used in later edits? |
| 117831384 | almost 2 years ago | Could you confirm the source for the maxspeed change? Was it the NSW Speed data used in later edits? |
| 117791362 | almost 2 years ago | Could you confirm the source for the maxspeed change? Was it the NSW Speed data used in later edits? |
| 129760120 | almost 2 years ago | Just letting you know that I will be going through your changesets, and doing reversions to many of them (mainly the 'NSW Speed data' ones), because of the above issues. For some changesets, the source isn't clear, so I'll probably ask some questions on those changesets when I come to them. This has been discussed on the talk-au mailing list. |
| 116519029 | almost 2 years ago | Partial reversion done, as per discussion on talk-au mailing list. See changeset/147406352 |
| 141445146 | almost 2 years ago | Partial reversion done, as per discussion on talk-au mailing list. See changeset/147406352 |
| 140660737 | almost 2 years ago | Partial reversion done, as per discussion on talk-au mailing list. See changeset/147406352 |
| 137773356 | almost 2 years ago | Partial reversion done, as per discussion on talk-au mailing list. See changeset/147406352 |
| 147406352 | almost 2 years ago | Partial reversion of changesets:
I've added access=discouraged to the way. This has been discussed on the talk-au mailing list.
The actual reversion was delayed as there was the possibility of NPWS joining the discussion on the list, but unfortunately this never eventuated. |
| 140826420 | almost 2 years ago | Just checking on the source for the maxspeed change - the maxspeed 60 seems to extend an unusually long distance from Talwood. Mapillary images from September 2023 show a temporary 60 zone for roadworks - is this what you saw? |
| 146881278 | almost 2 years ago | Just checking on the source for the maxspeed change - is this from the NSW Speed Data source or from local survey? Google imagery from Dec 2023 still shows maxspeed 20 (which I had surveyed previously) |
| 129759603 | almost 2 years ago | Just letting you know that the maxspeed is still signposted 80 (not 100) on this road |
| 129759614 | almost 2 years ago | Just letting you know that the maxspeed is still signposted 80 (not 100) on both these roads |
| 129760120 | almost 2 years ago | Just wondering what the "NSW Speed data" source is? I've recently been through here, and The Lakes Way is still maxspeed 80 (not 100). I didn't check Old Soldier's Road on my recent trip, but on Google Street View, it's maxspeed is still 90 (not 100). |
| 116519029 | over 2 years ago | I've just sent an email to the talk-au mailing list to get a consensus on this. way/29415025 was overgrown at my 2022 survey, so it's quite likely gone by now. The other three ways (29415022, 630040313, 1052666246) were present on the ground in 2022. |
| 116519029 | over 2 years ago | Also, has there been a formal request directly to OSM 'behind the scenes' from NPWS regarding these paths, that I am not aware of? |
| 116519029 | over 2 years ago | It's probably better to have something present on OSM, rather than deleting it. Otherwise, someone else could come along later and add it back in, not knowing there's been an issue. If the path has been formally closed, then access=no is an alternate tag to use. (This was used in a similar situation last year in another national park, when a new user deleted a path without discussion.) This might need another survey to clarify. |
| 137773356 | over 2 years ago | Just checking - is this based on a survey of the tracks? If the tracks are still visible, it might be better to leave the ways in, possibly with alteration of the tagging (depending on the current status of the tracks). See also discussion at changeset changeset/116519029 which concerns earlier edits to these ways. |
| 140660737 | over 2 years ago | Just checking - is this based on a survey of the tracks? If the tracks are still visible, it might be better to leave the ways in, possibly with alteration of the tagging (depending on the current status of the tracks). See also discussion at changeset changeset/116519029 which concerns earlier edits to these ways. |