Sorry, missed that - now sorted

Hi @tree_squad, I've removed the tourism=camp_site tag because this isn't a place where people can camp overnight with tents, motorhomes or caravans. I think it's a yurt so I've tagged it as a building=ger; please feel free to tag it better if you wish. Wiki links for these tags:
tourism=camp_site
building=ger

Hi, I'm removing the access=no tag you added because access= is about legal restrictions which do not apply here. The track is also passable on foot (it was about 2 weeks ago anyway), so I've adjusted smoothness to very_horrible

Hi,
Yes I remember this one (2 years ago). When I walked this 2 years ago it was mostly too narrow to drive a car/landrover along so no longer a track. It had recently been resurfaced about 5ft wide with a good quality gravel surface - that would make it a path. But it is signed at either end as part of a cycle loop so I chose highway=cycleway and surface=gravel.
All OK?
Cheers

Hi, I moved the name from way/48076622/history to a new route relation because that's a better way to tag a route name, I don't know anything about the Sutherland Trail itself, didn't see any signs when I was in the area and have no objection to you deleting it (but the original tagger might)

Apologies, assumed it was a mistake and gate not visible in air photo - have now restored the gate too.

Hi jamesks, this changeset seems to have broken a lot of multipolygons I created to map the land use around Brahan and Moy Woods (around here osm.org/#map=14/57.5710/-4.5234).
Please could you fix?

fixed

Good point, agreed, done.

I visited in person and discovered that camping was not possible - it is only open to people renting a pitch long term. Can you suggest a better tag combination?

No sorry, I didn't have time to go down Windmill Road.

Yes you're right, all I did was re-tag 113081869 to put it underground. Feel free to delete one.

Oops. JOSM crashed during upload, I thought I had resolved conflicts correctly but clearly not.
Think I have fixed most of the duplicates now.

None of these are campsites, they are just laybys beside the road. I don't think they should appear on OpenStreetMap.

Didn't spot that when I was there because OsmAnd doesn't render natural=cave. I don't think there is a cave there, it's up a steep wooded bank, but I can't be sure.

Yes that probably is the reason it's been tagged as a nature reserve. So the follow on question is does the boundary of a Regional Park need to appear on a general purpose map? Other landscape designations e.g. national scenic areas, forest parks don't seem to appear (and/or have not been mapped).

I don't think the Pentland Hills Regional Park is a leisure=nature_reserve, as it is not managed primarily for conservation. I think boundary=protected_area and protection_class=7 is enough.

Thanks for comment - I've checked osm.wiki/Talk:Tag:highway%3Dtrack and I think you're right. Have fixed this one and some others nearby.

Well spotted, thanks. These roads are open for non motorised users so I have corrected the access tags to reflect this.