Thanks for your input. My thinking was that it was more accurate to indicate a man-made structure crossing the waterway (even if not 100% accurate) rather than leave it as an issue which causes the road to be "broken". I noticed these because of routing problems. In hindsight I could have added a fixme tag to the nodes, but do you still think it's better to completely omit and leave it as an issue? Thanks, Joe

Thanks for the update. I visited the area on my ride today and saw the new signs, as well as no trespassing signs at the Tasman Road end (they are further along the path from the road). I did some local investigating and was told that they have a problem with motorised vehicles accessing the land and that non-motorised use is permitted. I was given the email address of the property owner so will make some further enquiries and update as necessary.

Woah, yeah it looks like you've been busy! I'll try and head out over there some time and take a look. I bike through there, but there weren't any signs on that route. There are plenty of side trails, so perhaps there is another way through that is open.

Thanks for the update, I haven't been over this way for a couple of months. Do you happen to know if there are signs posted at the other end (Tasman Road) also?

My mistake, thanks for pointing this out. I have removed that tag.

Thanks for the advice. I removed the old path.